statism watch

Future U.S.-Canada Joint Arctic Security and Control

Share

Related: Canadian Forces exercise to be held in High Arctic with American, Danish troops | Strengthening NAFTA Ties and the Push Towards a Common Security Front | America would send troops to G8/G20 if required | Fighter jets buzz Toronto, Muskoka in G20 test runs | U.S. combat jets buzzing Ont. border city | Clinton’s Arctic comments cheer Inuit | Inuit group blasts Cannon over summit | Indigenous groups left out of Arctic leaders’ summit | A North American Security Perimeter Coming Into View | Canada warms to idea of a tougher ‘perimeter’ | Canada an ‘energy superpower’ in Arctic, Foreign Minister says | Arctic borders will be defended: MacKay | Arctic expert questions Canada’s northern strategy | Northwest Passage surveillance study halted | Sarnia resident plans ‘moon’ protest of US border spy balloon | Military spycraft patrols Ontario border from Fort Drum | Military’s ‘Polar Breeze’ cloaked in secrecy | Ignatieff on Obama visit: Crisis an opportunity for continental, global integration | Predator drones patrolling border irk Manitoba MLA | U.S. set to launch Predator drones to monitor Manitoba border | Harper plays down threat to Arctic sovereignty | New policy emphasizes U.S. interests in Northwest Passage | Military Tech on the Home Front: Predator drones to begin surveillance of Canada-US border | Surveillance on the Great Lakes: U.S. tightens security along border | UN Given Power to Mediate in Arctic Disputes | RCMP and US Coast Guard to integrate as Canada signs border pact with Homeland Security | Canada, U.S. agree to use each other’s troops in civil emergencies | U.S. Northern Command, Canada Command establish new bilateral Civil Assistance Plan | Nunavut taken aback by military plan for drone patrols | U.S. to patrol Manitoba border with drone aircraft | Remote-controlled aircraft would patrol Arctic: military

Dana Gabriel, BeYourOwnLeader
June 29, 2010

The Arctic has been the subject of dispute between Canada, Denmark, the U.S., Russia and Norway with each country taking steps to expand their scientific research and military presence. Its vast untapped oil, natural gas and mineral resources represent a tremendous economic potential, but control of the region is also important from a strategic standpoint. Increased cooperation and military integration could be used to further secure interests in the area. Canada and Denmark recently signed an agreement which will promote defence and security collaboration in the Arctic. In August, Canadian Forces operations in the far North will include Danish and American participation. There are also calls for U.S.-Canada joint security of North America’s Arctic waters and skies.

Canada continues to assert its military presence in its northernmost boundaries. Operation Nunalivut which ran in the Arctic from April 6-26, is one of three sovereignty exercises conducted each year by Canadian Forces (CF). This year’s joint maneuvers included, “the first landing and takeoff of an Air Force CC-177 Globemaster III aircraft at CFS Alert, from a gravel and ice covered airfield and the first CF dive in the high Arctic, which was the longest sustained ice dive operation in CF history. In addition, the Arctic Response Company Group conducted concurrent training with the Canadian Rangers for the first time in the Arctic, while a team of nine Regular and Reserve Force Signallers tested a new series of Iridium, high frequency and satellite communication systems.” As part of ongoing efforts by Canada-Denmark to strengthen diplomatic and security relations in the Arctic, the operation featured, “combined training with the Danish military’s SIRIUS Dog Sledge patrol.” An agreement reached between Russia and Norway over the long-disputed area in the Barents Sea has also prompted Canada to take steps to resolve conflicting Arctic offshore boundary claims with Denmark and the United States.

In May, Canada and Denmark signed a Memorandum of Understanding that will deepen defence and security cooperation in the Arctic, “through enhanced consultation, information exchange, visits, and exercises.” The annual joint Canadian Forces Operation Nanook will take place in the high Arctic from August 6-28. It is significant as it will include ships from the Danish and American navies, as well as the U.S. Coast Guard. Canada also recently announced measures designed to further protect and defend its northern sovereignty. “Beginning July 1, the Government of Canada is requiring that foreign and domestic vessels of a certain size report to the Canadian Coast Guard if travelling through Canada’s Arctic waters. This new mandatory requirement will ensure vessels report information such as identity, position and destination to the Canadian Coast Guard.” There has been much contention over the Northwest Passage. Canada maintains that it is an internal waterway and thus falls under its control, but the U.S. argues that it is an international strait. There are calls for the U.S and Canada to essentially suspend their disagreement over the northern sea route and assume joint continental management and security of the Arctic.

A new report titled Open Canada: A Global Positioning Strategy for a Networked Age put out by the Canadian International Council, contains a section on Arctic issues. One of its key proposals is that, “Canada share responsibility with the U.S. for control of North America’s Arctic waters and skies through an expanded NORAD. This extends to search-and-rescue as well as joint monitoring, air patrols and icebreaker operations.” The policy paper emphasizes, “Canada has a responsibility to beef up its security capabilities in the Arctic, but it is not going to win an arms race, if it comes to that.” It also admits, “closer Canada—U.S. security cooperation in the Arctic could place strains on other members of the Arctic Council. But a bilateral security arrangement between well-established defence partners in their sector of the Arctic is justifiable. It serves our national interest in the North and deepens our relationship with the U.S. and will ultimately be accepted by the others.” Not only does this threaten Canadian sovereignty and expand military integration with the U.S., but it encourages the further militarization of the Arctic.

A recent editorial from the Globe and Mail warns that, “Inviting the United States to assume responsibility for patrolling Canada’s Arctic waters, as a new report from the Canadian International Council proposes, is a bit like inviting a fox to guard the henhouse.” It goes on to say the recommendation, “is really a call for the U.S. to assume responsibility for the security of Canada’s Arctic, since the might of the superpower would inevitably relegate Canada to the status of junior partner when it tried asserting its sovereignty.” Anyone who doubts U.S. intentions in the Arctic need not look any further than National Security Directives established under President George W. Bush. It acknowledges that, “The United States has broad and fundamental national security interests in the Arctic region and is prepared to operate either independently or in conjunction with other states to safeguard these interests. These interests include such matters as missile defense and early warning; deployment of sea and air systems for strategic sealift, strategic deterrence, maritime presence, and maritime security operations; and ensuring freedom of navigation and overflight.” Further control of the Arctic is important from a geopolitical, economic, and military standpoint.

In the last number of years, Russia has asserted itself in the high Arctic by sending bomber patrols, as well as warships and submarines into the region. At times, Russian and Canadian rhetoric in regards to Arctic sovereignty, has been reminiscent of the Cold War era. Increasing diplomatic efforts is the key to building the foundation for more multilateral cooperation in the area. Unfortunately, it appears as if the military build-up of the far North will continue. Canada has taken on the role of an Arctic power, but with the assurance of U.S. and NATO support. Enhanced security collaboration between U.S-Canada and other northern allies is an essential part of America’s Arctic strategy. Military expansion could limit attempts by other nations to gain more influence in the region. The scramble for resources and the further militarization of the Arctic make it a potential flashpoint for conflict.

Source | See Also under Sovereignty: Dollar should be replaced as international standard, UN report says | Global governance fail: National sovereignty stands tall at the G20 | G20 banking reform agreed upon, to be finalized in Seoul | Greece starts putting island land up for sale to save economy | Canada flunks on indigenous rights: G20 native protesters | EU wants control over member budgets | How will democracy fare under the G20’s new world order? | UK may try to stop Iceland joining EU over bank collapse refund | Canadian Forces exercise to be held in High Arctic with American, Danish troops | Strengthening NAFTA Ties and the Push Towards a Common Security Front | G20 agenda named as “global government” by thinktank, Toronto summit set to sit on hands | America would send troops to G8/G20 if required | Can-EU trade talks look good but face 3 potential sticking points: Spanish envoy | Israel to reject UN call for flotilla raid probe, MV Rachel Corrie under steam | Israel to deport all detained aid flotilla activists by end of day | EU trade pact may imperil local control over water | Obama sending 1,200 troops to Mexico border | European Council On Foreign Relations: EU Needs To Use Crisis For Greater Power | Canada’s navy cuts coast patrol fleet in half | EU wants member countries to co-ordinate budgets | Marc Emery, ‘Prince of Pot’ will be extradited | Lewenza: Canada-EU deal will affect more than trade | Fighter jets buzz Toronto, Muskoka in G20 test runs | Canada, EU at loggerheads over bank tax | Greece’s near bankruptcy won’t scuttle Canada-EU trade talks: minister | Harper calls for global economic governance, lauds G20 as ruling forum | Canada offers Michigan $550M loan for NASCO link bridge | Big stakes in Canada-Europe trade talks, but little attention | Flaherty wins delay in decision on global bank tax at interim G20 meeting | U.S. combat jets buzzing Ont. border city | Global bank tax urged by IMF | Oil sands deal gives China crucial voting bloc in bitumen export issue | Obama sets sights on Arctic oil and gas exploration | Clinton’s Arctic comments cheer Inuit | EU ‘Free Trade’ and CETA: Advancing the Transatlantic Agenda | CETA worse than ACTA — EU Trade Negotiators Demand Canada Completely Overhaul Its Intellectual Property Laws | While Government Treats Citizens As Terrorists, Mexican Military Invades U.S. | Pacific North American Regional Integration and Control | Frustrated Icelanders vent rage by voting no in referendum | West coast regionalization rears its head in ‘Cascadia’ | Leaked UN Documents Reveal Plan For “Green World Order” By 2012 | EU executive recommends fast-track membership for Iceland | Inuit group blasts Cannon over summit | Precedent setting meeting called as Canada’s premiers attend Governors Association in Washington DC | Euro currency union shows strains | B.C., 3 US states sign accord for ‘Pacific North America’ hours before Olympic kickoff | Indigenous groups left out of Arctic leaders’ summit | ACTA Is Called An ‘Executive Agreement’ To Implement Restrictive Copyright With Less Hassle Than A Treaty | A New Generation of ‘North American’ Citizens | EU cautions Greece about its deficit | Canada files ‘continental’ Copenhagen emissions target with UN | No solution in dispute over Iceland deposits | Harper urges G20 to follow economic accords | Iceland sets date for Icesave vote | A North American Security Perimeter Coming Into View | Iceland blocks central bank debt repayment deal | See more under The Memory Hole — Sovereignty

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.