The following is the text of a speech Soros gave at the Institute of International Finance in Vienna. It’s actually rather interesting to plough through, as a number of puzzles have been tabled for our consideration. However, this is time elegantly wasted, for it misses the point. His analogy of the delicate two-stage operation to correct the course of a skidding car is brilliant in that it highlights precisely what is wrong with Keynesian monetary policy – as bubbles collapse, the inflationary manipulation of an economy requires policy makers to have that sense of precisely when the tires begin to find purchase in the gravel to turn the wheel. Or, perhaps a boarding analogy would be apt – on either water or snow, you’re riding the knife’s edge of a system of balanced factors atop a wave. Toe forward or back a little too much and you’re face forward into the surf. However, this is where Soros’ analogy breaks down, because his argument is premised on Keynesian market manipulation as a given, as a natural process. In reality, it’s no more natural than using a magic power to mess with our driver/surfer by altering the coefficient of friction of the road surface, or the viscosity of water on the fly – it introduces a third variable which markets are ill-equipped to compensate for. Drivers should not have to worry about the additional risk of driving into quicksand, or snowboarders into slush, any more than is natural. Yet this is what happens when you manipulate the money supply, this is the root of moral hazard.
Soros, true to form, is again blaming the ‘unseen hand’ of markets for the rather more prosaic hands-on activities of regulators that monkey with the delicate machinery of economic systems. Even on the most benevolent interpretation of the motivations of our money masters, a political dimension is introduced whereby the choices of influential market actors (large private and central banks granted the ability to inflate currency through leverage or the creation of money) creates a situation where ‘reflexivity’ is amplified and even the most experienced surfer of economic waves not privy to the additional variable is wiped out.
Soros’ suggested tonic for the action of the third variable? To introduce a fourth variable and grant regulators the power to manipulate the viscosity of credit. Surely we can see where this is headed. To find the tonic, visit the Von Mises Institute website, which advocates the opposing ‘Austrian’ economic theory.
Related: Soros warns Europe of disintegration | Man who broke the Bank of England, George Soros, ‘at centre of hedge funds plot to cash in on fall of the euro’ | Davos 2010: George Soros warns gold is now the ‘ultimate bubble’, calls for IMF to handle climate fund | George Soros Calls for World Currency and “New World Architecture” | Soros: China Will Lead New World Order | Soros points out regulated markets fail to operate on market fundamentals, calls for more regulation
George Soros, The New York Times
June 10, 2010
In the week following the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers on Sept. 15, 2008 – global financial markets actually broke down, and by the end of the week, they had to be put on artificial life support. The life support consisted of substituting sovereign credit for the credit of financial institutions, which ceased to be acceptable to counterparties.
As Mervyn King of the Bank of England brilliantly explained, the authorities had to do in the short term the exact opposite of what was needed in the long term: they had to pump in a lot of credit to make up for the credit that disappeared, and thereby reinforce the excess credit and leverage that had caused the crisis in the first place. Only in the longer term, when the crisis had subsided, could they drain the credit and re-establish macroeconomic balance.
This required a delicate two-phase maneuver just as when a car is skidding. First you have to turn the car into the direction of the skid and only when you have regained control can you correct course.
The first phase of the maneuver has been successfully accomplished – a collapse has been averted. In retrospect, the temporary breakdown of the financial system seems like a bad dream. There are people in the financial institutions that survived who would like nothing better than to forget it and carry on with business as usual. This was evident in their massive lobbying effort to protect their interests in the Financial Reform Act that just came out of Congress. But the collapse of the financial system as we know it is real, and the crisis is far from over.
Indeed, we have just entered Act II of the drama, when financial markets started losing confidence in the credibility of sovereign debt. Greece and the euro have taken center stage, but the effects are liable to be felt worldwide. Doubts about sovereign credit are forcing reductions in budget deficits at a time when the banks and the economy may not be strong enough to permit the pursuit of fiscal rectitude. We find ourselves in a situation eerily reminiscent of the 1930s. Keynes has taught us that budget deficits are essential for counter cyclical policies, yet many governments have to reduce them under pressure from financial markets. This is liable to push the global economy into a double dip.
It is important to realize that the crisis in which we find ourselves is not just a market failure but also a regulatory failure, and even more importantly, a failure of the prevailing dogma about financial markets. I have in mind the Efficient Market Hypothesis and Rational Expectation Theory. These economic theories guided, or more exactly misguided, both the regulators and the financial engineers who designed the derivatives and other synthetic financial instruments and quantitative risk management systems which have played such an important part in the collapse. To gain a proper understanding of the current situation and how we got to where we are, we need to go back to basics and re-examine the foundation of economic theory.
I have developed an alternative theory about financial markets which asserts that financial markets do not necessarily tend toward equilibrium; they can just as easily produce asset bubbles. Nor are markets capable of correcting their own excesses. Keeping asset bubbles within bounds have to be an objective of public policy. I propounded this theory in my first book, “The Alchemy of Finance,” in 1987. It was generally dismissed at the time, but the current financial crisis has proven, not necessarily its validity, but certainly its superiority to the prevailing dogma.
Let me briefly recapitulate my theory for those who are not familiar with it. It can be summed up in two propositions. First, financial markets, far from accurately reflecting all the available knowledge, always provide a distorted view of reality. This is the principle of fallibility. The degree of distortion may vary from time to time. Sometimes it’s quite insignificant, at other times it is quite pronounced. When there is a significant divergence between market prices and the underlying reality I speak of far from equilibrium conditions. That is where we are now.
Second, financial markets do not play a purely passive role; they can also affect the so-called fundamentals they are supposed to reflect. These two functions that financial markets perform work in opposite directions. In the passive or cognitive function, the fundamentals are supposed to determine market prices. In the active or manipulative function market, prices find ways of influencing the fundamentals. When both functions operate at the same time, they interfere with each other. The supposedly independent variable of one function is the dependent variable of the other, so that neither function has a truly independent variable. As a result, neither market prices nor the underlying reality is fully determined. Both suffer from an element of uncertainty that cannot be quantified. I call the interaction between the two functions reflexivity. Frank Knight recognized and explicated this element of unquantifiable uncertainty in a book published in 1921, but the Efficient Market Hypothesis and Rational Expectation Theory have deliberately ignored it. That is what made them so misleading.
Reflexivity sets up a feedback loop between market valuations and the so-called fundamentals which are being valued. The feedback can be either positive or negative. Negative feedback brings market prices and the underlying reality closer together. In other words, negative feedback is self-correcting. It can go on forever, and if the underlying reality remains unchanged, it may eventually lead to an equilibrium in which market prices accurately reflect the fundamentals. By contrast, a positive feedback is self-reinforcing. It cannot go on forever because eventually, market prices would become so far removed from reality that market participants would have to recognize them as unrealistic. When that tipping point is reached, the process becomes self-reinforcing in the opposite direction. That is how financial markets produce boom-bust phenomena or bubbles. Bubbles are not the only manifestations of reflexivity, but they are the most spectacular.
In my interpretation equilibrium, which is the central case in economic theory, turns out to be a limiting case where negative feedback is carried to its ultimate limit. Positive feedback has been largely assumed away by the prevailing dogma, and it deserves a lot more attention.
I have developed a rudimentary theory of bubbles along these lines. Every bubble has two components: an underlying trend that prevails in reality and a misconception relating to that trend. When a positive feedback develops between the trend and the misconception, a boom-bust process is set in motion. The process is liable to be tested by negative feedback along the way, and if it is strong enough to survive these tests, both the trend and the misconception will be reinforced. Eventually, market expectations become so far removed from reality that people are forced to recognize that a misconception is involved. A twilight period ensues during which doubts grow and more and more people lose faith, but the prevailing trend is sustained by inertia. As Chuck Prince, former head of Citigroup, said, “As long as the music is playing, you’ve got to get up and dance. We are still dancing.” Eventually a tipping point is reached when the trend is reversed; it then becomes self-reinforcing in the opposite direction.
Typically bubbles have an asymmetric shape. The boom is long and slow to start. It accelerates gradually until it flattens out again during the twilight period. The bust is short and steep because it involves the forced liquidation of unsound positions. Disillusionment turns into panic, reaching its climax in a financial crisis.
The simplest case of a purely financial bubble can be found in real estate. The trend that precipitates it is the availability of credit; the misconception that continues to recur in various forms is that the value of the collateral is independent of the availability of credit. As a matter of fact, the relationship is reflexive. When credit becomes cheaper, activity picks up and real estate values rise. There are fewer defaults, credit performance improves, and lending standards are relaxed. So at the height of the boom, the amount of credit outstanding is at its peak, and a reversal precipitates false liquidation, depressing real estate values.
The bubble that led to the current financial crisis is much more complicated. The collapse of the subprime bubble in 2007 set off a chain reaction, much as an ordinary bomb sets off a nuclear explosion. I call it a superbubble. It has developed over a longer period of time, and it is composed of a number of simpler bubbles. What makes the superbubble so interesting is the role that the smaller bubbles have played in its development.
The prevailing trend in the superbubble was the ever-increasing use of credit and leverage. The prevailing misconception was the belief that financial markets are self-correcting and should be left to their own devices. President Reagan called it the “magic of the marketplace,” and I call it market fundamentalism. It became the dominant creed in the 1980s. Since market fundamentalism was based on false premises, its adoption led to a series of financial crises. Each time, the authorities intervened, merged away, or otherwise took care of the failing financial institutions, and applied monetary and fiscal stimuli to protect the economy. These measures reinforced the prevailing trend of ever-increasing credit and leverage, and as long as they worked, they also reinforced the prevailing misconception that markets can be safely left to their own devices. The intervention of the authorities is generally recognized as creating amoral hazard; more accurately it served as a successful test of a false belief, thereby inflating the superbubble even further.
It should be emphasized that my theories of bubbles cannot predict whether a test will be successful or not. This holds for ordinary bubbles as well as the superbubble. For instance, I thought the emerging market crisis of 1997-98 would constitute the tipping point for the superbubble, but I was wrong. The authorities managed to save the system and the superbubble continued growing. That made the bust that eventually came in 2007-8 all the more devastating.
What are the implications of my theory for the regulation of the financial system?
First and foremost, since markets are bubble-prone, the financial authorities have to accept responsibility for preventing bubbles from growing too big. Alan Greenspan and other regulators have expressly refused to accept that responsibility. If markets can’t recognize bubbles, Greenspan argued, neither can regulators – and he was right. Nevertheless, the financial authorities have to accept the assignment, knowing full well that they will not be able to meet it without making mistakes. They will, however, have the benefit of receiving feedback from the markets, which will tell them whether they have done too much or too little. They can then correct their mistakes.
Second, in order to control asset bubbles it is not enough to control the money supply; you must also control the availability of credit. This cannot be done by using only monetary tools; you must also use credit controls. The best-known tools are margin requirements and minimum capital requirements. Currently, they are fixed irrespective of the market’s mood, because markets are not supposed to have moods. Yet they do, and the financial authorities need to vary margin and minimum capital requirements in order to control asset bubbles.
Regulators may also have to invent new tools or revive others that have fallen into disuse. For instance, in my early days in finance, many years ago, central banks used to instruct commercial banks to limit their lending to a particular sector of the economy, such as real estate or consumer loans, because they felt that the sector was overheating. Market fundamentalists consider that kind of intervention unacceptable, but they are wrong. When our central banks used to do it, we had no financial crises to speak of. The Chinese authorities do it today, and they have much better control over their banking system. The deposits that Chinese commercial banks have to maintain at the People’s Bank of China were increased 17 times during the boom, and when the authorities reversed course, the banks obeyed them with alacrity. [Ed. Note: China, too, has a serious sovereign debt concern. Soros' proposition here seems unlikely but more research is needed.]
Third, since markets are potentially unstable, there are systemic risks in addition to the risks affecting individual market participants. Participants may ignore these systemic risks in the belief that they can always dispose of their positions, but regulators cannot ignore them because if too many participants are on the same side, positions cannot be liquidated without causing a discontinuity or a collapse. They have to monitor the positions of participants in order to detect potential imbalances. That means that the positions of all major market participants, including hedge funds and sovereign wealth funds, need to be monitored. The drafters of the Basel Accords made a mistake when they gave securities held by banks substantially lower risk ratings than regular loans: they ignored the systemic risks attached to concentrated positions in securities. This was an important factor aggravating the crisis. It has to be corrected by raising the risk ratings of securities held by banks. That will probably discourage loans, which is not such a bad thing.
Fourth, derivatives and synthetic financial instruments perform many useful functions, but they also carry hidden dangers. For instance, the securitization of mortgages was supposed to reduce risk through geographical diversification. In fact, it introduced a new risk by separating the interest of the agents from the interest of the owners. Regulators need to fully understand how these instruments work before they allow them to be used, and they ought to impose restrictions [to] guard against those hidden dangers. For instance, agents packaging mortgages into securities ought to be obliged to retain sufficient ownership to guard against the agency problem.
Credit-default swaps (C.D.S.) are particularly dangerous. They allow people to buy insurance on the survival of a company or a country while handing them a license to kill. C.D.S. ought to be available to buyers only to the extent that they have a legitimate insurable interest. Generally speaking, derivatives ought to be registered with a regulatory agency just as regular securities have to be registered with the S.E.C. or its equivalent. Derivatives traded on exchanges would be registered as a class; those traded over-the-counter would have to be registered individually. This would provide a powerful inducement to use exchange traded derivatives whenever possible.
Finally, we must recognize that financial markets evolve in a one-directional, nonreversible manner. [Ed. Note: Eg; through continued inflation of the money supply.] The financial authorities, in carrying out their duty of preventing the system from collapsing, have extended an implicit guarantee to all institutions that are “too big to fail.” Now they cannot credibly withdraw that guarantee. Therefore, they must impose regulations that will ensure that the guarantee will not be invoked. Too-big-to-fail banks must use less leverage and accept various restrictions on how they invest the depositors’ money. Deposits should not be used to finance proprietary trading. But regulators have to go even further. They must regulate the compensation packages of proprietary traders to ensure that risks and rewards are properly aligned. This may push proprietary traders out of banks, into hedge funds where they properly belong. Just as oil tankers are compartmentalized in order to keep them stable, there ought to be firewalls between different markets. It is probably impractical to separate investment banking from commercial banking as the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 did. But there have to be internal compartments keeping proprietary trading in various markets separate from each other. Some banks that have come to occupy quasi-monopolistic positions may have to be broken up.
While I have a high degree of conviction on these five points, there are many questions to which my theory does not provide an unequivocal answer. For instance, is a high degree of liquidity always desirable? To what extent should securities be marked to market? Many answers that followed automatically from the Efficient Market Hypothesis need to be re-examined.
It is clear that the reforms currently under consideration do not fully satisfy the five points I have made, but I want to emphasize that these five points apply only in the long run. As Mervyn King explained, the authorities had to do in the short run the exact opposite of what was required in the long run. And as I said earlier, the financial crisis is far from over. We have just ended Act II. The euro has taken center stage, and Germany has become the lead actor. The European authorities face a daunting task: they must help the countries that have fallen far behind the Maastricht criteria to regain their equilibrium while they must also correct the deficiencies of the Maastricht Treaty which have allowed the imbalances to develop. The euro is in what I call a far-from-equilibrium situation. But I prefer to discuss this subject in Germany, which is the lead actor, and I plan to do so at the Humboldt University in Berlin on June 23. I hope you will forgive me if I avoid the subject until then.
Source | See also under Economics: Tucker Bilderberg 2010 Wrapup: Attack on Iran discussed, World Treasury Dept delayed | UN Security Council imposes fourth round of sanctions on Iran | Liberals admit HST will cost families up to $480 a year | G20 agenda named as “global government” by thinktank, Toronto summit set to sit on hands | Double-dip recession ‘practically inevitable’: UBS | European markets decline for 3rd day | Why Governments Hate Gold | Gold price hits new record as it breaks through $1,250 | Goldman Sachs subpoenaed for failing to cooperate with finance probe | Egypt says Gaza blockade has failed, border crossing opened in wake of aid flotilla assault to stay | Bilderberg Agenda Revealed: Globalists In Crisis, Supportive Of Attack On Iran | Banks Seized by Regulators in Nebraska, Mississippi, Illinois | Bilderberg 2010: Why the protesters are your very best friends | G20 to delay tough bank tax regulations | Geithner speaketh on the globalization of risk as G20 meets in Seoul | Eurozone plan for common bond issue to head off debt crisis |Eurozone plan for common bond issue to head off debt crisis | Underground economy emerges in Ontario in response to HST | Markets finish week with big losses on US employment, Hungarian default fears | Can-EU trade talks look good but face 3 potential sticking points: Spanish envoy | Will Supercorp get off the ground in Ontario? | PM takes pre-summit pitch to Europe | Iran To Dump 45 Billion Euros For Gold Bullion & Dollars | EU plans to create watchdog to curb credit rating agencies | Into the Abyss: The Cycle of Debt Deflation | Global arms spending tops $1.6T | Canada’s economy grows faster than expected | EU trade pact may imperil local control over water | Canadian debt: The $1.4 trillion hole we’re in | Budget watchdog probing G8/G20 summits’ $1-billion price tag | G20 now singing different regulatory tunes | US money supply plunges at 1930s pace as Obama eyes fresh stimulus | Lehman launches court battle against JPMorgan | Global markets rebound as OECD talks up European prospects | UK Coalition ministers and bankers to oppose pan-European bailout fund | New securities watchdog plan allows provinces to opt out | Gold being bought faster than it can be produced | TSX claws back from deep loss, Spain begins bailouts | Obama celebrates banking bill’s passage in Senate | Markets, dollar plunge on EU debt fears | Toronto banks review G20 security after Ottawa RBC fire | Germany’s Merkel Says Euro Is in Danger | Congress blocks indiscriminate IMF aid for Europe | Germany bans naked short-selling | US claims Security Council backing for Iran sanctions | European debt fears batter TSX | Greece links U.S. banks to debt crisis | Agriculture Canada Report: Farming income gets hammered in 2010 | European Council On Foreign Relations: EU Needs To Use Crisis For Greater Power | Sarkozy threatened to quit euro in showdown with Germany: Report | Hedge funds vote threatens EU-US rift | Global markets slide on debt fears | Loonie, TSX slip on euro woes | European Powerbrokers Present Proposal For New Economic And Political Order | Multiple Wall Street banks investigated over links to ratings agencies | Manitoba looks at debit cards for welfare recipients | Power Financial wary of Toronto-based securities regulation push | British face big spending cuts as coalition shows unity on austerity | Europe and America Morally and Financially Bankrupt | Paul bill to audit Federal Reserve passes as one-shot deal | SEC widens probe of Wall Street to include Morgan Stanley | UK Unemployment up to highest level in 15 years | EU wants member countries to co-ordinate budgets | Bid To ‘Storm’ Irish Parliament During Bailout Protest Foiled | Toronto labour, native protesters ready for G20 demonstrations | Gold vaults nearly 3% to record high $1234, BMO sees $1600 horizon | EU deal euphoria fizzles out | Ron Paul: Euro Bailout Will Lead To Currency Collapse | ‘Shock and awe’ euro rescue lifts global markets | Lewenza: Canada-EU deal will affect more than trade | Industry Minister Clement invites input on Canadian digital economy | Western Central Banks back Trillion Dollar European rescue plan, ECB to manage markets | MPs divided on Canada-Colombia trade agreement | Euro zone to regulate hedge funds, vows to fend off ‘wolf pack’ traders at all costs | Free trade with Europe? | Euro crisis goes global as leaders fail to stop the rot | Debt crisis: Panic on Wall Street, stonewalling in Europe | Audit The Fed Push Strengthened By Second Front In Senate | Gold nears record high as stocks plunge | Canada, EU at loggerheads over bank tax | Quebec public-private wind power project generates turbulence | Greek rescue fears hit global stock markets | Goldman Sachs concedes case for restraining the big banks | Shaw buying up CanWest TV assets from Goldman-Sachs | Greece swallows tough medicine in $150B bailout, more spending cuts announced | Greece erupts as men from IMF prepare to wield axe | European Central Bank chief: Bank of International Settlements to Rule the Global Economy | Greece’s near bankruptcy won’t scuttle Canada-EU trade talks: minister | New austerity measures essential, says Greek PM | Harper calls for global economic governance, lauds G20 as ruling forum | HST begins taxing Ontario on Saturday | Canada offers Michigan $550M loan for NASCO link bridge | Goldman execs squirm in face of angry U.S. Senators | Greek debt crisis: Europe feels shockwaves as bailout falters | Standard & Poor’s downgrade Greek credit rating to junk status | Canadian housing market downturn a possibility, says report | Goldman’s Fabrice Tourre: Emails reveal he thought borrowers ‘won’t last long’ | Police State Canada 2010 and the G20 Summit | Big stakes in Canada-Europe trade talks, but little attention | Protesters and police get ready to square off at G20 summit | US prepares to push for global capital rules | World Bank gets $3.5-billion boost, revamps voting structure to make China number 3 | Greek bailout not limited to ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬45bn, Flaherty warns | In revealed e-mails, Goldman chief says we ‘made more than we lost’ by betting against market | Flaherty wins delay in decision on global bank tax at interim G20 meeting | IMF to move quickly on Greek request for loan | Greek PM calls for EU bailout loans | Unconstitutional? Ontario government slips another new energy tax in under the radar | Bankers Prepare To Assault Americans With VAT, Transaction Taxes | International World Bank ‘Farm-aid’ plan gets a modest start | The Obama Banking Regulation: Big Banks Are Too Politically Connected to Fail | Obama scolds Wall Street for fighting reform, pushes new regulation package | Greek civil servants strike, challenge EU/IMF talks | German bank severs Goldman ties | Goldman Sachs Eats Its Young | Foreigners continue to buy Canada | Flaherty stands firm against new bank tax | Canada’s brewing debt storm | Goldman Sachs charged with $1bn fraud over toxic sub-prime securities | Flaherty’s credit-debit code tougher than expected | Electricity rates surge in Ontario | China sells petrol to Iran while talking at UN about sanctions | Is Japan hurtling toward a debt crisis? | Do you take cash? In UK bills being supplanted by debit, RFID credit as retail revolution grows | Leveraged ETFs Are Under SEC Scrutiny | Oil sands deal gives China crucial voting bloc in bitumen export issue | Soros warns Europe of disintegration | Tucker: Bilderberg To Meet in Spain, Prolong Global Financial Recession For Another Year | Goldman fights accusations of greed | Roadblocks cleared for Windsor continental supercorridor link | Ontario unveils $8B in renewable energy projects | Investors rush to sell Greek bonds | Canada ‘enthusiastic rebound’ best in G7, OECD says | Small army to protect Toronto during G20 summit | Ontario launches U.S. bond | Paul Volcker: VAT, Carbon taxes may be necessary | Canadian dollar finds a solid resting place at parity | GM dealers sue law firm for conflict — Cassels also had government contract during restructuring | Nova Scotia budget hikes HST rate | J.P. Morgan rolls into Calgary | Auto industry rebound limited: experts | Toronto braces for G20 logistics crunch | Thousands protest Quebec budget | Wall Street: Looting Main Street | Manipulation of Gold Market by Financial Giants Exposed at CFTC Hearing | Britain pushes for new climate talks; IMF and global taxes to figure into wealth redistribution scheme | Obama sets sights on Arctic oil and gas exploration | The prison spending boom | G20 sounds warning over lack of progress on global regulation | EU ‘Free Trade’ and CETA: Advancing the Transatlantic Agenda | CETA worse than ACTA — EU Trade Negotiators Demand Canada Completely Overhaul Its Intellectual Property Laws | IMF struggles to conceal glee at Greek deal | Greece secures joint IMF/Eurozone bailout program | Facing years of deficits, Ontario freezes wages | Impact of $47B stimulus minimal: Fraser Institute | Canada’s GDP growth to top G7 in 2010 | Obama urges Senate to hand total oversight of financial sector to Federal Reserve, eliminate ‘Reserve’ part | Banking reforms urgent, Harper says at G20 sherpas’ meeting | RCMP needs 5,500 rooms during G20 summit | Greek PM threatens to go to IMF if no EU bailout | More stimulus spending coming | G20 ’sherpas’ meet with IMF, World Bank on Ottawa | Loonie passes 99 cents US | UK: Carbon capture storage lauded, will ‘generate 100,000 jobs and Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â£6.5bn a year’ | Subsidized solar power projects approved in Ontario | Chinese facing debt time bomb | Pacific North American Regional Integration and Control | JPMorgan, Citigroup Helped Doom Lehman, Report Says | Is China actually bankrupt? | General strike cripples Greece as protesters clash with police | China rejects Barack Obama’s call to change yuan policy | Ontario tax collectors get $45K severance, keep jobs in HST federalization deal | Federal budget watchdog disputes Flaherty’s forecasts | MEPs vote overwhelmingly for an EU Tobin Tax | Green energy bubbles threaten to pop at both Federal and Municipal levels | Failed Banks May Get State Pension-Fund Backing as FDIC Seeks Cash | IMF chief calls for quota-based global warming slush fund | McGuinty eyes selling shares in LCBO, Hydro One | Frustrated Icelanders vent rage by voting no in referendum | Icelanders to vote no on debt deal | Ontario in no rush to sell Crown assets, minister says | Athens erupts as Greek austerity plan passes | Hope keeps Flaherty’s balanced budget afloat | Britain grapples with debt of Greek proportions | Greece unveils radical austerity package | Downtown Toronto to become a fortress for G20 summit | Athen’s coffers to run dry in two weeks, more cracks appear in Eurozone | IMF chief proposes new reserve currency | Man who broke the Bank of England, George Soros, ‘at centre of hedge funds plot to cash in on fall of the euro’ | Goldman role in Greek crisis probed | Bernanke Pushes to Keep Regulation Power as Some Senators Waver | Iceland stares into Icesave abyss | Leaked UN Documents Reveal Plan For “Green World Order” By 2012 | Citibank Controversy Puts Dubious FDIC Guarantee Back In The Spotlight | 702 U.S. banks in danger: FDIC | EU executive recommends fast-track membership for Iceland | Greek workers stage general strike | Tories hand out $75 billion worth of ’spending restraint’ | How EU Countries Cooked Books Using Derivatives | Inuit group blasts Cannon over summit | Toronto braces for G20 disruption, Ottawa to pick up security tab | Precedent setting meeting called as Canada’s premiers attend Governors Association in Washington DC | Convention centre confirmed as location for Toronto G20 summit | U.S. initial jobless claims rise unexpectedly | Goldman Sachs Helped Greece Obscure Debt Through Currency Swaps | Obama hails stimulus plan, warns of layoffs | Canadian household debt hits record high | Collapse of the euro is ‘inevitable’: Bailing out the Greek economy futile, says French banking chief | Euro currency union shows strain | B.C., 3 US states sign accord for ‘Pacific North America’ hours before Olympic kickoff | G20 security could strangle downtown | Shaw Cable moves for acquisition of controlling share in Canwest Global | Gordon Brown’s plan for global bank tax ‘a step closer’ | Stimulating our way into debt crises | EU leaders reach secret Greek bailout deal | GM to add second Oshawa shift early | Indigenous groups left out of Arctic leaders’ summit | G20’s Metro Convention Centre location to bump baseball, pride activities | Greek workers ‘give their reply’ to proposed austerity plan with national strike | Will Greece set off ‘global debt bomb’? | G7 brings competing visions to the Arctic | The Federal Reserve as Giant Counterfeiter | The US budget: Barack Obama’s $3.8 trillion red ink blueprint | EU cautions Greece about its deficit | Global Bank Insurance Levy Wins Support over Transaction Tax at Davos | Consumer debt loads are the new concern | No solution in dispute over Iceland deposits | Bloomberg: Secret Banking Cabal Emerges From AIG Shadows | Davos 2010: George Soros warns gold is now the ‘ultimate bubble’, calls for IMF to handle climate fund | Harper urges G20 to follow economic accords | Davos: Global climate fund threatens aid to developing world, campaigner warns | Obama Likely to Rebrand Climate Bill as Jobs Bill | Bankers unite against Barack Obama and Gordon Brown in call for world regulation | Geithner Told To Quit After E Mails Reveal Involvement In AIG Cover-up | IMF warns against retreat from stimulus spending | Why Did the ‘Stimulus’ Fail to Help the US Economy? | One quarter of US grain crops fed to cars — not people, new figures show | Terence Corcoran: Ontario puts $10B in the wind | Banks find gaping loophole in Obama financial reforms | Ontario Premiere McGuinty heralds Samsung ‘green energy’ deal | Obama talking tough with banks | High dollar to slow recovery, central bank says | EU Embargoes Canada’s GMO-sabotaged Flax Industry | Could Greece drag down Europe | EU urged to adopt bank supertax | Record surge in UK inflation | Iceland sets date for Icesave vote | ‘Green jobs’ are key to U.S., Canadian recovery: US Ambassador | Flaherty to use February G7 in Iqaluit (or Ottawa?) to push for global changes to financial system | ‘Significant chance’ of second financial crisis, warns World Economic Forum | Iceland says IMF aid likely delayed | Wall Street’s leading bankers admit: we made mistakes | The next big scam: Fraud endemic to carbon market | Flaherty’s economic plan blasted as leading to taxation or cuts | Idle job market hurting recovery, Flaherty warns | No new stimulus, economy ’stabilized’: Harper | Obama ponders bank transaction levy to recoup bailout shortfalls |TSX trades above 12,000 before retreating | Explosive Leaked Emails Expose Treasury Secretary Geithner’s Deception in ‘Backdoor Bailout’ | America slides deeper into depression as Wall Street revels | Tipping point at CanWest | Sarkozy says world currency disorder unacceptable | UK: Interest rates and quantitative easing on hold | Iceland blocks central bank debt repayment deal | Bernanke defends Fed’s actions, forecasts interest hikes | For more see The Memory Hole — Economics