statism watch

The lies used to begin wars are legion, and testament to the fact that populations do not naturally desire war.

Flashback: UK: Did MI5 kill Dr David Kelly? | Pakistani officers helped plan Mumbai attacks, says India | Former ISI Chief: Mumbai And 9/11 Both “Inside Jobs” | German Intelligence Agents Caught Staging False Flag Terror in Kosovo | Cheney Considered False Flag Operation to Justify War with Iran | Wolfowitz: U.S. Future Hinges on Another ‘Crisis’ | US scales up covert destabilization efforts in Iran, continues funding ‘al-Qaeda’ | McCain adviser says terrorist attack would boost campaign | Rumsfeld to Pentagon Media Analysts: America Needs another Attack | US Counterinsurgency Manual Leaked, Calls for False Flag Operations, Suspension of Human Rights | Declassified: Israel, USA Attempted Deliberate Sinking of USS Liberty During Mideast War | The Lies that Led to War | British Special Forces Caught Carrying Out Staged Terror In Iraq? | Operation Northwoods Declassified: U.S. Military Wanted to Provoke War With Cuba

Tim Shipman, Daily Mail
November 25, 2009

The full extent of how Tony Blair misled the public about Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction before and after the Iraq War was laid bare yesterday.

The Chilcot Inquiry heard that just ten days before the invasion of Iraq Mr Blair was told Saddam had no way of using weapons of mass destruction.

And weapons experts revealed that the former Prime Minister took Britain to war based on intelligence that his own spies rated just ‘four out of ten’ for accuracy.

On the eve of the conflict, intelligence chiefs told Mr Blair that the Iraqi dictator had no warheads capable of delivering chemical weapons, dramatically undermining the Prime Minister’s case for war.

Yet Mr Blair gave the go-ahead for the invasion despite strong evidence that Iraq was no threat to Britain.

Then, after the war, officials had to tell Mr Blair not to ‘declare success too rapidly’ in the quest to find WMD in Iraq as he continued to make misleading statements claiming that ‘massive evidence’ had been found.

The revelations reinforce the case that intelligence evidence that Saddam was no threat was ignored by Mr Blair to take Britain to war on a false prospectus.

Sir William Ehrman, former Director General of Defence and Intelligence at the Foreign Office, said that on March 10, 2003 – ten days before the start of the war – British spies reported that Iraq had ‘disassembled’ what chemical weapons it had.

He said: ‘On March 10 we got a report saying that the chemical weapons might have remained disassembled and that Saddam hadn’t yet ordered their re-assembly and he might lack warheads capable of effective dispersal of agents.’

The evidence was summarised in a Joint Intelligence Committee report circulated in Whitehall on March 19.

Sir William blamed ‘contradictory intelligence’ for the failure to put the brakes on.

But Tim Dowse, Foreign Office head of counter-proliferation between 2000 and 2002, also revealed that a month earlier, in February 2003, UN weapons inspector Hans Blix had made clear that he did not believe the mythical weapons existed.

‘He raised it at a meeting with ministers,’ Mr Dowse said.

The most damning testimony concerned Downing Street’s decision to write the now infamous dossier in September 2002 to make the case for war.

Both WMD experts made clear that ‘huge gaps’ in intelligence on Iraq were flagged up to ministers, leaving them with no excuse when the caveats were removed from the final dossier.

Sir William said experts concluded that there never was ‘an imminent threat’ from Iraq, describing it only as a ‘clear and present threat’.

He explained that intelligence knowledge of Saddam’s weapons programmes was ‘patchy’ in May 2001, ’sporadic and patchy’ in March 2002, and revealed that an August 2002 briefing note for ministers admitted ‘we know very little’ about Iraq’s chemical and biological weapons work since 1998, when weapons inspectors were ejected.

Both witnesses said that in the years before the war Iraq was not even seen as the main threat.

Sir William said: ‘In terms of nuclear and missiles, I think Iran, North Korea and Libya were probably of greater concern than Iraq.’ Mr Dowse added: ‘It wasn’t top of the list.’

The Government also tried to justify the war in Iraq because WMDs could fall into the hands of terrorists. But Mr Dowse said that Saddam had only ’sketchy’ links to Al Qaeda, had ’stepped further back’ after the 9/11 attacks and had never passed WMD to terrorists.

By September 2002, as the dossier was being written, Sir William said the intelligence about Saddam’s WMD ‘remained limited’.

He added: ‘The biggest gap in all of that, and one which ministers were extremely well aware of and used extensively, was the lack of interviews with scientists.’

Yet in his foreword to the dodgy dossier, Mr Blair claimed ‘beyond doubt that Saddam has continued to produce biological weapons’.

That claim was condemned by the Butler Report into the intelligence in 2004 as ‘not a statement it was possible to make’ because ‘intelligence does not have that degree of certainty’.

Mr Dowse, who worked on the dossier, made clear he had not seen Mr Blair’s foreword before publication and took aim at the former Prime Minister, saying: ‘With hindsight the Butler committee made a fair comment.’

Sir William admitted that weapons inspectors said that six out of ten intelligence reports proved inaccurate. ‘Four out of ten as a strike rate is pretty good,’ he said.

But historian Sir Lawrence Freedman, for the inquiry, interrupted: ‘Not when you are going to war.’

Mr Dowse later cast serious doubt on the accuracy of Mr Blair’s claims after the war, when the Iraq Study Group (ISG) was in the process of exposing that there was no WMD in Iraq.

In December 2003, nine months after the invasion, Mr Blair was still insisting: ‘The ISG has already found massive evidence of a huge system of clandestine laboratories.’

Mr Dowse said: ‘I did not advise him to use those words’, and admitted that officials had told ministers not to ‘declare success too rapidly’.

He said: ‘My concern was that we should not announce things until we were absolutely certain of our ground because it would have been a disaster, frankly, in PR terms.’

Last night LibDem foreign affairs spokesman Edward Davey said: ‘This new evidence shows that the intelligence was, if anything, pointing towards Iraq becoming less of a threat.

‘A leader of courage and conviction would have used such evidence to halt the drumbeat for war, but Blair just turned a blind eye to intelligence that contradicted his case.’

And 45-minute warning was misleading, too

Tony Blair’s claim that Saddam Hussein could hit British targets in just 45 minutes was misleading, the Iraq Inquiry heard.

The claim was the centrepiece of the so-called dodgy dossier published by Downing Street in September 2002 to justify the case for war.

But Tim Dowse, Foreign Office head of counter proliferation when the dossier was being drawn up, said that it only ever referred to short-range battlefield rockets, not long-range missiles.

That crucial distinction was omitted from the dossier and encouraged the drift to war.

Mr Dowse said: ‘When I saw the report I didn’t give it any particular significance because it didn’t seem out of line with what we generally assessed to be Iraq’s capability in terms of weapons.

‘I assumed it was referring to multibarrelled rocket launchers that could be rapidly deployed in a battlefield. It subsequently took on a rather iconic status that I didn’t think those of us who saw the initial report gave it.’

Asked about suggestions that the 45-minute claim referred to WMDs which could be used by Iraq to strike another nation, Mr Dowse said: ‘I don’t think we ever said that it was for use in a ballistic missile in that way.’

Inquiry panel member Professor Sir Lawrence Freedman pointed out: ‘But you didn’t say it wasn’t.’

But Mr Dowse admitted that he had pushed for the inclusion of a paragraph on how some Iraqi missiles could hit British bases in Cyprus.

That became conflated with the 45 minute claim at the time, leaving many members of the public with the impression that weapons of mass destruction could be deployed on longrange missiles to hit British targets.

The dossier eventually read that Saddam’s ‘military planning allows for some of the WMD to be ready within 45 minutes of an order to use them. I am quite clear that Saddam will go to extreme lengths, indeed has already done so, to hide these weapons and avoid giving them up’.

In his foreword, Mr Blair wrote: ‘What I believe the assessed intelligence has established beyond doubt is that Saddam has continued to produce chemical and biological weapons, that he continues in his efforts to develop nuclear weapons, and that he has been able to extend the range of his ballistic missile programme.’

Source | See Also under History: Ethnic hostility is a big, maybe the biggest, part of the Afghan war | Canada’s royal link has rusted out | The universality of war propaganda | Omar Khadr ‘innocent’ in death of U.S. soldier | Castro’s sister says she was a CIA spy | Pentagon used psychological operation on US public, documents show | The JFK Assassination: New York Times Acknowledges CIA Deceptions | Toronto 18 video evidence released | Israel rules out Gaza probe | UN body endorses Gaza war crimes report | Danish Prime Minister Knew WTC Would Collapse | UN body debates Gaza war crimes report | GG relaunches Truth and Reconciliation Commission | Nazi Olympics exhibit opens in Vancouver | Italian dictator Mussolini was British WWI agent | UN condemns ‘war crimes’ in Gaza | American dissenters urge: “Stop the 9-11 cover-up” | Serve your country to honour memory of 9/11: Obama | Able Danger and DIA had advanced knowledge of 9/11 | China’s crackdown for patriotism on 60th anniversary | How the collapse of Lehman Brothers pushed Wall Street to the brink | Bernier’s mislaid files held foreign policy secrets: report | BC chiefs kill flawed aboriginal rights law | U.S. probes ‘inhumane’ CIA tactics under Bush | US Officer responsible for Vietnam massacre finally apologizes | ‘Coalition of the willing’ comes to end in Iraq | A Sibel Edmonds Bombshell – Bin Laden Worked for U.S. Until 9/11 | U.S. native activist Peltier up for parole hearing | UK: Did MI5 kill Dr David Kelly? | Israeli soldiers allege abuses against Palestinians | Swine flu ‘related’ to 1918 pandemic virus – survivors exhibit resistance | Professor fingers Thermite charges as responsible for 9/11 demolition | UK: As rumours swell that the government staged 7/7, victims’ relatives call for a proper inquiry | Did leak from a laboratory cause swine flu pandemic? | US Congress Passes the 1,200-page Climate Bill that it was not allowed to read | Goldman Sachs: The Great American Bubble Machine | Leaked documents in 9/11 suit show House of Saud links to ‘Al-Qaeda’, extremism | Bankster “Holiday” Planned for September? | New members tapped for residential school commission: report | Police pounce on 20th Tiananmen anniversary | Tiananmen Square: briefly, anything seemed possible | ‘Brothers’ Bush, Clinton draw ire, ovations during Toronto visit | State Of War Between Two Koreas After Armistice Ended | Abuse ‘endemic’ in Irish Roman Catholic schools: Report | Former aide challenges Mulroney claim he cancelled arms plant | Claim of Swiss account ‘preposterous,’ Mulroney says | Secret report details Nazi plan to create a European Union | Airbus funds likely source of Schreiber’s ‘Britan’ account: witness | Lessons of 1976: swine flu, fear, mass vaccinations, wasted millions | Memo: 9/11 Commission Witnesses Were Intimidated By Government “Minders” | Al-Qaeda Chief In Iraq: Captured, Killed, Never Actually Existed, Now Captured Again | US Homeland Security forced to retract statement accusing Canada of importing 9/11 terrorists | 9/11 Commission Counsel: Government Agreed to Lie About 9/11 | BC Court Tells Ottawa to Amend Status Rules for Natives | Vioxx, Gardasil maker Merck and Co drew up doctor hit list | Intelligence made it clear Saddam was not a threat, diplomat tells MPs | Mainstream Financial Publication Finally Admits that Austrian Economists Were Right | New book details Mossad false flag assassination attempt on Canadian passports | Chair to have final say as residential schools commission jobs rewritten | Geronimo’s descendants fight Yale secret society for their ancestor’s remains | Obama signs stimulus bill | Huffington Post article calls for new 9/11 investigation | Fire Consumes Beijing Skyscraper, Unlike WTC7 Building Does Not Collapse | Remaining 2 members resign from residential schools commission | Former President Jimmy Carter Supports Call For New 9/11 Investigation | Obama shuts network of CIA ‘ghost prisons’ | Inauguration triggers joy, jubilation around world | A decade later, Lastman proud he called in army | Mulroney-Schreiber probe has no jurisdiction to find liability | Vets Sue CIA Over Mind Control Tests | They hate us for our bombs | Researchers unlock secrets of 1918 flu pandemic | Kissinger Calls For New International System Out Of World Crises | The ugly spectre of ‘new Keynesianism’ and the self-appointed Guardians | They killed their neighbors: genocide’s foot soldiers | Mulroney confidant knew about Airbus commissions: CBC News investigation | Author wins award for work identifying categories of state corruption | Take note Naomi Klein: Democrats consider crises as opportunities, too | Commission to Probe Graves at Native ‘Residential School’ Sites | Landmark E. Howard Hunt JFK Confession Video Tape Ignored | Government to hold talks over future of residential-schools commission | History: How the US Government Was Overthrown In Three Easy Steps | Delta Force Officer: We Weren’t Allowed to Kill Osama Bin Laden | Liberal candidate asked to step down over 9/11 comments | Stalin’s mass murders were ‘entirely rational’ says new Russian textbook praising tyrant | ‘88 uprising scorched in Burmese memory | Long history of Tibet, China, and British interference means all sides guilty of abuses | White House ‘buried British intelligence on Iraq WMDs’ | Literary icon that exposed Stalinist state labour camps dies at 89 | CIA, Pakistani ISI have long, complicated relationship | U.S. Intel Officer: Al Qaeda Leadership Allowed To Operate Freely in Pakistan | Chinese Torture Techniques Inspired Interrogations at Guantánamo | Don’t blame right-wing thugs for eugenics — Socialists made it fashionable | Actually, it’s time to imagine a new world order | Canadian connection in the Martin Luther King assassination | Declassified: Israel, USA Attempted Deliberate Sinking of USS Liberty During Mideast War | Harper, Bush Share Roots in Controversial Philosophy | Project Paperclip: The US Nazi Amnesty | Much of Britain sprayed in secret germ warfare tests | Alberta Barren: The Mannings and forced sterilization in Canada

This entry was posted on Wednesday, November 25th, 2009 at 1:41 pm and is filed under accountability, disinformation, history, propaganda, provocation, terror. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.