statism watch

What’s happened to the traditional Conservative invective against political correctness? Presumably the allure of the cultural control method so favoured by the Soviets is hard to resist for those with a totalitarian streak.

Flashback: Fund me or axe me, parliamentary budget officer says | Budget officer ‘can’t tell’ if stimulus plan working

Heather Scoffield, Canadian Press
November 4, 2009

‘It smells a little bit,’ expert says of essay question on Harper budget that is now part of recruitment process for elite civil-service program

An elite federal program to recruit the cream of new graduates suddenly wants to know the applicants’ views on the government’s vaunted Economic Action Plan before they get a job interview.

The Accelerated Economist Training Program invites highly educated people to develop careers in the federal public service, starting at a senior level.

Successful candidates go through two years of training at four departments. They start at about $50,000 a year and after two years can earn over $80,000.

Spaces are in high demand among university graduates.

But this year, for the first time, candidates need to provide more than a list of qualifications and good marks. They also must to write 1,000 words on the federal government’s last budget, promoted widely as the Economic Action Plan.

The budget devoted billions to programs meant to lift the country out of recession. It has now become the centre of government advertising and is at the heart of election campaigning and the Conservative party’s promotional efforts.

“In 2009, the Government of Canada introduced Canada’s Economic Action Plan to help Canada’s economy weather the economic storm,” says the application form. “In 1,000 words or less, please choose two of these measures and discuss their implications for Canada.”

Applicants must consider the social, economic or international policy implications of the budget, it says.

Applications need to be submitted by Monday. It’s the first time recruits have to submit an essay. It’s also the first time recruiting has been led by the Privy Council Office. Treasury Board spearheaded the program in previous years.

“It smells a little bit,” said Leslie Pal, professor of public policy at Ottawa’s Carleton University.

“It places an unfortunate implication of inviting people to write glowing things about the economic recovery plan.”

Pal said he sees no rationale for asking people looking for a job with the government to comment on current government policy, especially when that policy is so contentious.

“I think this is not a good idea.”

Prime Minister Stephen Harper has complained past that the civil service was too Liberal.

But some academics say it’s too soon to say the Tories are using the hiring program to screen future top bureaucrats with Conservative leanings.

In the past, selection of successful candidates has been done by a panel of public servants, not politicians, notes Matthew Mendelsohn, director of the University of Toronto’s Mowat Centre public policy think-tank.

“I have no indication that they’re trying to filter certain people for the public service.”

The action plan has been the object of widespread advertising by the Conservative government. Signs promoting the initiative are plastered in front of the thousands of infrastructure projects that have received funding from the plan’s stimulus program.

The government has been harshly criticized for spending at least $34-million to promote it, and for allegedly using the budget to further political ends. All four Conservative candidates in by-elections set for next week have made the action plan central to their campaigns.

The Opposition Liberals have filed complaints with the federal ethics commissioner over the Conservatives’ use of giant fake cheques to promote the funding. The cheques in question have carried the party logo or featured an MP’s name emblazoned across the top.

At the same time, some senior public servants have quietly raised concerns about what they see as the politicization of the bureaucracy and the prime minister’s penchant for using the Privy Council Office for political purposes, rather than just policy.

Officials at both PCO and the Prime Minister’s Office have denied criticisms the civil service is becoming politicized.

The Public Service Commission prides itself for upholding a strictly non-partisan workforce that is hired based on merit alone, and has issued guidelines to reflect the principle.

In a recent paper on impartiality, the commission warns that partisan hiring could undermine the legitimacy of government practices, erode public trust, cause turmoil and high turnover, and even threaten the essence of a functioning democracy.

Applicants can be forgiven for thinking the essay requirement is asking for a partisan response, but they’d probably be wrong, said Mike Joyce, an adjunct professor at the School of Policy Studies at Queen’s University.

“They’d be looking for analytic capacity,” he said. “Often they’re not looking for the ‘right’ answer.”

A spokesperson for PCO did not immediately respond to questions about the hiring process.

Source | See Also under Parliament: Fund me or axe me, parliamentary budget officer says | Tories move closer to killing gun registry | Protesters disrupting question period detained and bloodied by hill security | No way to escape Afghan combat post-2011, Hillier says | Pass climate bill before UN summit, Layton says | Ottawa won’t budge on secrecy laws | Ottawa was warned Afghan detainees might be tortured | Harper’s hedge on H1N1 shot sparks confusion | Ontario health minister quits over $1B scandal | Liberal MP introduces war resisters bill | McGuinty won’t deny political interference with Freedom of Information requests | Ont. Liberals block committee probe of eHealth chiefs | Bernier’s mislaid files held foreign policy secrets: report | Flaherty chooses himself as authority on banking oversight | CSIS ignored Khadr’s human rights: Parliamentary report | Information commissioner quits, Ottawa chided for lacking ‘guts’ | Ottawa appeals court order to repatriate Omar Khadr | MPs call for clear policy against torture | MPs call for expanded privacy law | Prepare to be boarded! Pirate Party wins entry to European Parliament | MPs from all four parties ink secret deal on cash | UK: Fury as Commons denied vote on DNA database | Canadian Parliament Threatens People For Posting Video Of Proceedings Online | Former Justice Minister Accused in Suit of Accepting Kickbacks | Moores linked to Airbus before Mulroney came to power, memo reveals | Schreiber Inquiry: Premier’s wife testifies bank account was to be hers, not Mulroney’s | Israeli parliament approves Netanyahu’s new government | Mulroney-Schreiber inquiry steers clear of ‘Airbus affair’ on first day | Canada, allies will never defeat Taliban, PM says | Government secrecy ‘grim,’ watchdog says | Harper government withholds listeriosis notes | Behemoth budget bill to be rammed through parliament unread | Former privacy czar Radwanski acquitted of fraud charges | Harper drops Cadman libel lawsuit against Liberals | Ignatieff seeks Harper-like control of party message | Watchdog alarmed by Harper’s information clampdown | Ottawa risks erasing decade of debt reduction | Mulroney-Schreiber probe has no jurisdiction to find liability | Ban-happy Ontario accused of ‘Big Brotherism’ | Counterterrorism squad secretly taped arrest of British whistleblower, elected MP | Liberal crown for Ignatieff? | Decision to prorogue parliament sets ‘very dangerous’ precedent: constitutional expert | Harper halts parliament amid row | Mulroney confidant knew about Airbus commissions: CBC News investigation | Tories release secret tape of ‘coalition’ strategy meeting | Cuts to party subsidies will stay: Flaherty | Tories back down on plan to withdraw funding for opposition parties | Stephen Harper, evil genius, to pull financial plug on opposition: National Post | Deficits ‘essential,’ Harper says | ‘Hard decisions’ needed during economic crisis: throne speech | Harper’s own lawyer decides to bail on Cadman scandal | Cadman ‘bribe tape’ not altered as Harper claimed, expert finds | Harper wins delay of hearing on Cadman tape | Tories admit to using regional funds for federal campaign last election | Comedian begins asking Harper question, cuffed by RCMP | Green Party leader calls out Harper, Layton for debate boycott threats | Tories announced $8.8B in spending before election call | Files tagged as `sensitive’ cause unfair delays, watchdog says | Harper testifies he authorized offer to Cadman | Tentacles of Secrecy Grip Tightly | PM’s tactic `authoritarian’ | Tory ‘Guilty before proven innocent’ law to make debut in court | Judge orders analysis of Cadman audio tape | Federal government quietly releases $490B military plan | Parliament losing power, author says | Information lockdown: How Harper Controls the Spin | Parliament losing power, author says | Son of ‘Patriot Act’ Author Denies Connection to Obama-NAFTA Leak | Signs point to PMO in NAFTA leak | Government could have planted Couillard bug: former CSIS agent | Bernier quits cabinet post over security breach | PM’s aide fuelled uproar | Elected Parliamentarians Neutered by PM-Appointed ‘Courtiers’ | Another Conservative candidate attacks ‘in-out’ ad scheme | Tape suggests PM knew of alleged Cadman offer | Donations of money, property and services continue to corrupt Canadian politics | ‘What is it they’re trying to hide?’ NDP asks for military export data | The Mulroney Affair: Why politicians seek out the rich | Harper to create government-run media centre: report | Twenty years ago today, the clock clicked down on free trade | The Fifth Estate: Money, Truth, and Spin | Harper pledges to boost military presence in cities | Harper, Bush Share Roots in Controversial Philosophy | Steven Harper and the Bilderbergers Secret Meeting

This entry was posted on Wednesday, November 4th, 2009 at 3:30 pm and is filed under accountability. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.