Ottawa denies altering public’s ECopyright Consultation submissions
Friday, August 28th, 2009
Remember when Tony Clement hung up on the CBC’s Search Engine during some rather pointed questioning by Jesse Brown? It would appear that public accountability is not one of this Ministry’s strong suits.
Flashback: Security guards stop MPs, students from distributing fair use flyers at Toronto copyright townhall | Can The Public Be Heard On Copyright Issues? | Copyright Consultation Launches: Time For Canadians To Speak Out | Third stab at copyright law ‘reform’ to kick off with consultations | Time to slay Canadian file-sharing myths | Canadian copyright lobbyists leaned on “independent” researchers to change report on file-sharing | Think tank plagiarizes, pulls report on Canadian piracy | Obama Administration Claims Copyright Treaty Involves State Secrets | Latest Round of Closed-Door ACTA Copyright Negotiations Wrap Up | Digital rights groups sue for access to secret ACTA treaty | Critics waging a cyber offensive to fight copyright changes | Canadian Industry Minister lies about Canadian DMCA on national radio, then hangs up | The Canadian DMCA: Check the Fine Print | Government ready to drop copyright bomb | Transparency needed on ACTA | Revamped copyright law targets electronic devices | New Attempt to Align Canada’s Copyright Act with USA Coming Soon | Canadian DMCA To Be Introduced Tomorrow Morning?
CBC News
August 28, 2009
Industry Canada has dismissed allegations that it is altering submissions from the public to its website on the current copyright reform consultations.
The government ministry has sent a letter to Michael Geist, a University of Ottawa professor who is closely tracking the consultations, that counters some of the allegations he made on his blog Thursday.
“I read with some disappointment the allegations posted [on] your blog that you think the government could be altering submissions to our site,” wrote Darren Cunningham, director of communications for Industry Minister Tony Clement. “I can assure you and anyone who reads your blog the suggestion is patently false.”
Internet companies and civil liberties groups were