‘Global War on Terror’ rebranded as call to address extremism, social change
Friday, August 7th, 2009
A new phase of propaganda begins – first used as a pretext to justify militarization and empire-building exercises in the Middle East, ‘extremism’, whatever that means, is now to be retooled as the pretext for mass socialization of the domestic economy. Not that the Obama administration is going to engage in any substantial rollbacks of Bush II policies, you understand. hat wouldn’t be prudent either, in the face of ‘extremism’. It’s the next logical step in a continuing campaign of regime change, only now the regimes being changed are Western, and the methods to be used on the home turf are Fabian where possible.
Context: A Sibel Edmonds Bombshell – Bin Laden Worked for U.S. Until 9/11 | Pakistani president Asif Zardari admits creating terrorist groups | Western Governments Funding Taliban & Al-Qaeda To Kill U.S. Troops, Destabilize Countries | Taliban flee new U.S. drive in Afghanistan | Delta Force Officer: We Weren’t Allowed to Kill Osama Bin Laden | Low Level Driver Convicted Of Terror Charges While Bin Laden’s Senior Body Guard Was Let Go | US scales up covert destabilization efforts in Iran, continues funding ‘al-Qaeda’ | Report: U.S. Gave Green Light For Taliban Prison Attack | New Bin Laden Video: 100% Forgery | Investigative Reporter Seymour Hersh: US Indirectly Funding Al-Qaeda Linked Sunni Groups in Move to Counter Iran | US Allowed Taliban, Al-Qaeda Airlift Evacuation
Paul Koring, The Globe and Mail
August 7, 2009
Obama administration changes the nomenclature of a long struggle
The “global war on terrorism” is over and calling it that was a bad idea, President Barack Obama’s counterterrorism adviser said Thursday.
The phrase, coined by former president George W. Bush and often rendered in Washington speak as GWOT (pronounced “gee whot”) enraged many of his critics who argued that it was impossible to wage war on a tactic (or a noun). Mr. Obama has studiously avoided the phase and Thursday, John Brennan, the top White House adviser on homeland security and counterterrorism, explained why.
In his first public speech, the veteran CIA agent said that the shift is more sweeping than a change in vocabulary and that it reflects the President’s broad philosophical approach.

Since the revelation earlier this week of