Stockholm Court: Pirate Bay Judge ‘Unbiased’
Monday, June 8th, 2009
If he wanted to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest, perhaps he should have declared his affiliation with pro-copyright groups, a pretty standard journalistic practice known as full disclosure. Judges in Sweden may want to take a look at implementing some similar basic standards of accountability.
Flashback: Pirate Bay lawyer calls for retrial after judge confirms ties to copyright groups | Jail terms for Pirate Bay founders, appeal in works
David Kravets, Wired.com
June 8, 2009
The four Pirate Bay co-founders were convicted of copyright infringement by an unbiased judge, the Stockholm District Court told an appeals court Monday.
The district court made the statement to the Svea Court of Appeal in Sweden. It was in response to accusations by the defendants that they should get a retrial because the judge, Tomas Norstrom, was a member of pro-copyright groups.
“The memberships are simply a means to gain increased knowledge of copyright legislation issues and are not therefore grounds to establish bias, the Stockholm court told the court of appeals,” according to Swedish media. “On the contrary, the court argued, it is imperative that judges remain abreast of the issues.”
Days after the April convictions, attorneys for the four charged that Norstrom was hostile to the defense because of his affiliations with the Swedish Copyright Association and the Swedish Association for the Protection of Industrial Property.
OTTAWA – There are signs that Canada’s economy has stabilized, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty said today as a major international think-tank cited Canada among countries in the leading-edge of recovery.
About 40 Mohawk protesters blocked a bridge in eastern Ontario Sunday evening in support of a nearby First Nations community engaged in a standoff with the federal government over the arming of border guards.