A little frustrated? Talk back to an authority? Three months in the hole under the Patriot Act, slave. That’s the new freedom.
Ralph Vartabedian and Peter Pae, The LA Times
January 20, 2009
At least 200 passengers have been convicted of felonies under the Patriot Act, often for behavior involving raised voices and profanity. Some experts say airlines are misusing the law.
Reporting from Los Angeles and Oklahoma City — Tamera Jo Freeman was on a Frontier Airlines flight to Denver in 2007 when her two children began to quarrel over the window shade and then spilled a Bloody Mary into her lap.
She spanked each of them on the thigh with three swats. It was a small incident, but one that in the heightened anxiety after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks would eventually have enormous ramifications for Freeman and her children.
A flight attendant confronted Freeman, who responded by hurling a few profanities and throwing what remained of a can of tomato juice on the floor.
The incident aboard the Frontier flight ultimately led to Freeman’s arrest and conviction for a federal felony defined as an act of terrorism under the Patriot Act, the controversial federal law enacted after the 2001 attacks in New York and Washington.
“I had no idea I was breaking the law,” said Freeman, 40, who spent three months in jail before pleading guilty.
Freeman is one of at least 200 people on flights who have been convicted under the amended law. In most of the cases, there was no evidence that the passengers had attempted to hijack the airplane or physically attack any of the flight crew. Many have simply involved raised voices, foul language and drunken behavior.
Some security experts say the use of the law by airlines and their employees has run amok, criminalizing incidents that did not start out as a threat to public safety, much less an act of terrorism.
In one case, a couple was arrested after an argument with a flight attendant, who claimed the couple was engaged in “overt sexual activity” – an FBI affidavit said the two were “embracing, kissing and acting in a manner that made other passengers uncomfortable.”
“We have gone completely berserk on this issue,” said Charles Slepian, a New York security consultant. “These are not threats to national security or threats to aircraft, but we use that as an excuse.”
Justice Department spokesman Dean Boyd defended the prosecutions, saying that they have helped improve airline security. He added that the department has only pursued prosecution “when the facts and circumstances of a particular case warrant such action.”
Indeed, the law has given airlines new flexibility to clamp down on unruly behavior. But the intent of the Patriot Act provisions was to put terrorists in violation of the law before they could execute an actual takeover, said Nathan Sales, a law professor at George Mason University who helped write the Patriot Act when he served in the Justice Department.
But Sales acknowledged that in the fervor to protect the skies, the practical application of the law has strayed.
“A woman spanking her child is not as great a threat to aviation as members of Al Qaeda with box cutters. That much is clear,” he said.
For decades, airline personnel and law enforcement have had wide latitude in prosecuting unruly passengers, not only for assaults or threats but also for any behavior, including arguing, that disrupts a flight or “lessens the ability” of crew members to perform their jobs.
In practice, however, airlines have largely maintained order under Federal Aviation Administration rules, in which hundreds of unruly passengers are simply slapped with an infraction and fine each year.
According to FAA guidelines issued in 2007, “interference or intimidation of a crew member by itself is not chargeable under the [criminal] statute unless it rises to the level of physical assault, threatened physical assault or an act posing an imminent threat to the safety of the aircraft or other individuals on the aircraft.”
Sept. 11, however, changed everything. Within two months of the attacks, Congress passed the Patriot Act, a sweeping attempt to improve the nation’s defenses against international terrorism. It included broad new powers for law enforcement in such areas as electronic surveillance, money laundering and search warrants. [Ed. Note - Congress was not allowed to read this massive document prior to passing it. And the document was pre-written. How did that happen?]
Included were two key provisions on airline security. The first defined disruptive behavior as a terrorist act, reflecting the seismic shift in airline security.
The second broadened the existing criminal law so that any attempt or conspiracy to interfere with a flight crew became a felony — a change that allowed flight personnel to act against suspicious passengers even if they hadn’t begun an actual assault.
The law gave flight personnel enormous latitude in determining what precisely posed a potential threat or disruption, and judging by some cases, there is no clear standard.
Last summer, a Boston man who took off his clothes and attempted to open an emergency exit during a flight to Los Angeles was not charged with a crime, even though the plane was forced to make an unscheduled landing in Oklahoma City.
Such was not the case with Carl Persing and Dawn Sewell, a Lakewood couple who never left their seats during the 2006 incident aboard a Southwest flight to Raleigh, N.C., that led to their arrests and four days in jail.
FBI and local investigators in Raleigh alleged that the couple engaged in a variety of sexual activities during the flight. At one point, according to an FBI affidavit, Persing was “observed with his face pressed against Sewell’s vaginal area. During these actions, Sewell was observed smiling.”
A flight attendant twice asked them to stop, according to the affidavit, and Persing responded, “Get out of my face,” and later, “You and I are going to have a serious confrontation when we get off this plane.”
But he denied making a threat. He said he did not feel well because of a chemotherapy drug and had put his head in Sewell’s lap. “We were kind of confused why he was waking us up, why he wouldn’t let me sleep,” he said in a recent interview.
Charges were dropped against Sewell, but Persing, who had never been arrested before, was sentenced to 12 months’ probation.
He almost lost his job as a Port of Los Angeles mechanic, which requires a security clearance from the Department of Homeland Security. The department initially yanked the clearance but reinstated it after a review of the facts.
The Justice Department does not keep data on how many such prosecutions or convictions have occurred, Boyd said. But according to the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, a Syracuse University program, the federal government has obtained 208 felony convictions for disrupting flights since 2003, when data first became available.
The single case of actual terrorism cited by Boyd involved Briton Richard Reid, who is serving three life sentences. Reid was subdued by passengers and flight attendants on a 2001 flight from Paris to Miami after he was seen trying to ignite explosives in his shoe.
Tension aboard planes has increased over the years as the number of flight attendants onboard has declined and flights have grown more crowded.
Airlines, in most cases, have provided no additional training for flight attendants to deal with unruly passengers or potentially threatening situations, said Corey Caldwell, spokeswoman for the Assn. of Flight Attendants. The amount of training attendants receive — averaging six weeks — has not changed since Sept. 11.
Tolerance for irrational behavior linked to mental illness has also diminished, said Ronald Honberg, legal director for the National Alliance on Mental Illness.
In a number of cases, mentally ill passengers act bizarre, falsely claiming to have heart attacks, seeing terrorists or needing to escape the plane. In other cases, including one earlier this month in Los Angeles, they use the word “bomb” or claim to have a bomb. They are typically restrained, but whether they are prosecuted depends on the widely varying judgment of prosecutors around the country.
“If you get out of your seat and walk to the front of a plane and talk about bombs, you get what you deserve,” said Sales, the law professor.
On the other hand, Sales adds, “There are other sanctions than throwing the book at a person who has mental health issues.”
The costs of a conviction can be enormous. In Tamera Freeman’s case, it cost her custody of her children.
The confrontation on the Frontier Airlines flight to Denver was particularly harsh, recalled Amy Fleming, the flight attendant who told Freeman to stop spanking her children. In a recent interview, Fleming called Freeman the most unruly passenger she had seen in 11 years on the job.
“Absolutely she deserved a felony conviction,” she said.
But at least one passenger, John Carlson, a defense attorney who was seated near Freeman, said there was no threat. “There was a nasty, loud exchange,” Carlson said. Then Freeman “capitulated and offered no resistance. My sympathy shifted to her.”
A spokeswoman for Frontier said the airline has provided more training for flight attendants since 2001, including classes on “ways to calm a situation before it reaches a boiling point or physical confrontation.”
After three months in jail, Freeman agreed to plead guilty in exchange for being released on probation. A court-appointed attorney told her that a plea deal would be the fastest way to see her children, who had been taken back to Hawaii and put into foster care.
Her probation required her to stay in Oklahoma City, where she grew up, and prohibited her from flying. Meanwhile, legal proceedings in Hawaii have begun to allow the children’s foster parents to adopt them.
Freeman has been denied permission to attend custody hearings in Maui over the last six months, court records show.
“I have cried. I have cried for my children every day,” Freeman said. “I feel the system is failing me.”
Source | See Also under Culture: Inauguration triggers joy, jubilation around world | Toronto School Board to ‘review’ The Handmaid’s Tale on one parent’s complaint | A decade later, Lastman proud he called in army | GPS wristwatch helps parents track children | U.S. war resister, mother of 3 must leave Canada | France braced for ‘rebirth of violent left’ | They hate us for our bombs | Ban-happy Ontario accused of ‘Big Brotherism’ | Private firm may administer UK surveillance database | UK: Big Brother CCTV to spy on pupils aged four – complete with CPS evidence kit | Toronto surveillance project to enter new phase pending review | UK Culture secretary wants international age restrictions for web | ‘Greek Syndrome’ is catching as youth take to streets in France, Sweden | Reports reveal concerns over drug use among Canadian military | Canadian Junior Hockey team gets ‘military training’ | Army ‘Strategic Shock’ Report Says Troops May Be Needed To Quell U.S. Civil Unrest | 1,900 Guns Traded for Cameras in Toronto | Public access vs. government secrecy the issue in Supreme Court of Canada case | Afghan war boosts recruiting | Bestiality, suicide questions OK for job applicants, Halifax concludes | Has your child been CAFed? How the Government plans to record intimate information on every child in Britain | They killed their neighbors: genocide’s foot soldiers | SWAT Teams raiding Amish, Food Co-ops in Rural US | UK Big Brother police to get ‘war-time’ power to demand ID in the street | London musicians expected to disclose ethnicity, 8 pages of personal information to perform | Author wins award for work identifying categories of state corruption | UK launches high-visibility community punishment | Queen’s proposed thought-crime cadres prove controversial | Tribunal shouldn’t police online hate, report says | Safety report author Falconer on armed police in schools: “Facile” | Two More U.S. Military Units Assigned For Homeland Security | Australia to Implement Mandatory Internet Censorship | Parents, children to be fingerprinted at initial 250+ nursery schools in UK | Germany rejects full-body scans at airports | US military targets social nets | UK Shortly to Become Worse Surveillance Society than Stasi East Germany | Another U.S. War Resister to be deported | Tasering of mom with baby ‘necessary’ in order to take child, police say | ‘Pre-crime’ detector shows promise | India’s use of brain scans in courts dismays critics | Comedian begins asking Harper question, cuffed by RCMP | Council threatens families with a Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â£1,000 fine… for parking on their own driveways | 27 Toronto schools to get armed police presence | Troops in the Streets: Army Brigades Standing By to Assist in Disasters, Help Quell Dissent | Do Swiss parents need a childrearing licence? | Greyhound bus passengers now subject to arbitrary luggage searches | CCTV cameras spying on hundreds of classrooms | Brain will be battlefield of future, warns US intelligence report | RCMP spied on… Rita MacNeil? | Turning Toronto into a nanny state | Public conditioning continues: Ratings reach ‘Flashpoint’ for tactical assault squad drama | Behavioral Targeting: ‘It’s Only Going to Get Creepier’ | Chicago, awash in gun violence, gives Toronto advice: You need a gun ban like ours | U.S. army war resister’s deportation sparks outrage | RCMP conducts random search and seizure on Canada Day | TASER bracelets considered for airline passengers | Papers Please: UK cops stopping millions in streets | UK Parents Need Government Permission to Kiss Children | In the new Canada, we are all wards of the state | Air passengers to undergo ‘virtual strip search’ | Could humiliation be the next weapon in our war on crime? | Berlusconi puts 2,500 troops on streets of Italian cities to patrol alongside police | Blogger arrests hit record high | Freedom isn’t failing us – we’re unhappy because we’re no longer free | Hats banned from Yorkshire pubs over CCTV fears | TTC Considers Treating Employees Like Criminals with Forced Drug Testing | Pistol Pendant Causes Airport Holdup | $4 Million Earmarked for Cameras, “Respect” at Toronto Schools | Despite criticism, electroshock therapy commonly used in depression | Burmese monks sent to prison camps | You Are a Suspect