Paul Joseph Watson, Infowars.com
December 23, 2008
Reinforcing conviction that Silverstein was referring to demolition with infamous comments on PBS documentary
Newly uncovered video from 9/11 featuring an interview with FDNY lieutenant David Rastuccio on MSNBC confirms that there was a plan to deliberately demolish WTC Building 7, as was originally indicated in Larry Silverstein’s infamous statement on the PBS documentary, America Rebuilds.
In the clip, Rastuccio responds to the host’s statement that “You guys knew this was coming all day,” by stating, “We had first reports that the building was unstable and that it was best for it to come down on its own or it would be taken down, I would imagine that it came down on its own.”
Though Rastuccio expresses his opinion that the building had collapsed without the aid of explosives, he admits that a plan had been in place to deliberately demolish the structure.
Watch the clip.
This reinforces the fact that when Larry Silverstein infamously told a 2002 PBS documentary that a consideration had been made to “pull it,” which is a demolition industry term for deliberate implosion, he did indeed mean that WTC 7 was considered for deliberate demolition.
This would mean that Silverstein’s later qualification of his comments, that “pull it” simply meant to pull the firefighters out of the building, despite FEMA’s assertion that no firefighting operations even took place inside WTC 7, was an outright lie intended to deflect possible ramifications arising out of the $7 billion dollar payout Silverstein received in insurance after the WTC complex was destroyed.
Numerous other eyewitnesses have come forward to express their conviction that WTC 7 was deliberately demolished.
Emergency Medical Technician Indira Singh described to a radio show how she learned that WTC 7 was going to be “brought down” and the context was clear that it was to be deliberately demolished.
“After midday on 9/11 we had to evacuate that because they told us Building 7 was coming down. If you had been there, not being able to see very much just flames everywhere and smoke – it is entirely possible – I do believe that they brought Building 7 down because I heard that they were going to bring it down because it was unstable because of the collateral damage,” said Singh.
Former Air Force Special Operations for Search and Rescue expert Kevin McPadden also reported his conviction that a countdown preceded the collapse of the building.
“While we were on the right side, there was firefighters getting ready, they were bussing them back and forth, and a couple of vets that were there – they got the vibe that something was coming down,” said McPadden.
“We started asking questions, everybody started asking questions, and the next thing you know there was a Red Cross representative pacing back and forth in front of the crowd holding his hand over the radio – I couldn’t hear what it was saying but it was like pulsed – whatever the speech was on there it was pulsed – and that means to me most likely it was a countdown.”
“But he took his hand off at the last three seconds and he gave this heartfelt look – like just run for your life – because he didn’t want to bring it on his conscience – he didn’t want to go to his grave with that – and then we had a couple of seconds to put our heads together,” said McPadden.
Former NYPD officer Craig Bartmer also reported hearing bombs tear down WTC 7 as he ran away from its collapse.
Several TV news networks received advance knowledge that the building was likely to collapse, with both the BBC and CNN reporting at least 26 minutes in advance that the building had already collapsed when it still stood.
Rastuccio’s newly uncovered comments about a plan to demolish Building 7 are likely to provoke a firestorm of fresh suspicion surrounding the implosion of the structurally reinforced 47-story skyscraper, which collapsed in 7 seconds within its own footprint despite suffering relatively minor damage from the collapse of the twin towers.
Source | See also under 9/11:Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â Sept. 11 suspects want to “confess” | Former ISI Chief: Mumbai And 9/11 Both “Inside Jobs” | Delta Force Officer: We Weren’t Allowed to Kill Osama Bin Laden | National Post Columnist: Who dares to question the ‘Big Lie of 9/11? | Liberal candidate asked to step down over 9/11 comments | Key Witness to WTC 7 Explosions Dead at 53 | Post-traumatic stress disorder may affect up to 70,000 New Yorkers: Sept. 11 study | MSNBC News Anchor: Bush Administration “Allowed 9/11 Attacks To Occur” | Nader Calls For New 9/11 Investigation | NIST WTC 7 Report: Shameful, Embarrassing And Completely Flawed | Building near twin towers felled by fire, not explosives: report | US Government Questioned on Forged Letter Linking Saddam to 9/11 | White House ‘buried British intelligence on Iraq WMDs’ | A City’s Police Force Now Doubts Focus on Terrorism | Who knows what happened on 9/11? | Wolfowitz: U.S. Future Hinges on Another ‘Crisis’ | McCain adviser says terrorist attack would boost campaign | Emergency Official Witnessed Dead Bodies In WTC 7 Prior to Collapse | Impeachment Articles Against Bush Presented in US Congress | The Financial Times Covers the 9/11 Truth Movement | Guantanamo 9/11 suspects on trial | Legendary Author Gore Vidal Calls 9/11, Removal of Magna Carta a Coup d’Etat | Rumsfeld to Pentagon Media Analysts: America Needs another Attack | FBI documents contradict 9/11 Commission report | 9/11 widows call for new investigation after revelations of White House, commission ties | Director of 9/11 commission “secretly spoke with Rove, White House” | Eight U.S. State Department Veterans Challenge the Official Account of 9/11 | Twenty-five U.S. Military Officers Challenge Official Account of 9/11 | Ex-Italian President: Intel Agencies Know 9/11 An Inside Job | 9/11 – the big cover-up? | U.S. Government Caught Red-Handed Releasing Staged Al-Qaeda Videos | George W Bush Authorized 911 Attacks Says Government Insider | Conspiracy crusader doubts official 9/11 version | Swiss scientists 95% sure that Bin Laden recording was fake