Architect of North American integration urges reboot
Canadians.org
August 26, 2008
Professor Robert A. Pastor, a leading proponent of North American integration, writes in the July/ August 2008 issue of ‘Foreign Affairs’ that, “The April summit meeting (in New Orleans) was probably the last hurrah for the SPP. The strategy of acting on technical issues in an incremental, bureaucratic way, and of keeping the issues away from public view, has generated more suspicion than accomplishments. The new president will probably discard the SPP.”
Why? According to Pastor, “It is clear that the Bush administration’s incremental, quiet, business-based approach has not succeeded in promoting economic integration or closer collaboration with the United States’ neighbors. Instead, it has raised some legitimate concerns and provoked a nativist backlash. It was a mistake to allow CEOs to be the only outside advisers on deregulation and the harmonization of remaining regulations. Civil society and legislatures must be heard on these issues, which are less about business than about how to pursue environmental, labor, and health goals.”
What next then? Pastor writes, “For the last eight years, North America’s experiment in integration has stalled. The new president needs to restart the engine.”
What does Pastor propose? “The alternative approach needs to start with a vision of a North American Community and some institutions—quite different from Europe’s – designed to pursue a bold agenda that includes a customs union, a North American commission, a North American investment fund, and a common team of customs and border guards to man (sic) the borders and the continental perimeter. To move toward these goals, the next president should designate a national adviser for North American affairs, who would chair a cabinet-level committee to formulate a comprehensive plan and to help the president negotiate the difficult tradeoffs between special interests and national and continental interests. Instead of refighting the NAFTA debate, this comprehensive approach would lay the foundation for a new North America.”
He adds, “The three leaders should institutionalize summit meetings at least annually, and they should establish a North American commission composed of independent and distinguished leaders from academia, civil society, business, labor, and agriculture and with an independent research capacity. The commission should offer continental proposals to the three leaders. The leaders would continue to be staffed by their respective governments, but they would respond to a continental, rather than a dual-bilateral, agenda. The commission should develop a North American plan for transportation and infrastructure and plans on labor, agriculture, the environment, energy, immigration, drug trafficking, and borders.”
Surprisingly, Pastor also writes, “A majority of the publics in all three countries would prefer ‘integrated North American policies’ rather than independent national policies on the environment and border security, and a plurality feel the same way about transportation, energy, defense, and economic policies.” In that regard, he may want to read the quite contrary findings in our ‘Not Counting Canadians’ report at http://www.canadians.org/integratethis/backgrounders/notcounting/index.html.
Source | See Also under Integration: Canada’s made in America energy policy | Canadian ambassador to address fourth annual North American Forum in Washington | “North American Parliament” Meets At Integration Forum | New bridge slated for Windsor-Detroit corridor: sources | Student Mock Parliament to be held in Montreal Parallels Integrationist Aims of SPP | South American union is created | Business group sets and gets its agenda | Continental Business Lobby Releases List of Priorities for Government to Address at SPP Talks| North American ID card in the works through SPP | CBC-TV’s mini-series Trojan Horse is a very clever warning to Canadians about the North American Union agenda | New Documents Reveal North American Union PR Campaign | Canada, U.S. agree to use each other’s troops in civil emergencies | Consider a continental currency: Jarislowsky | Vicente Fox Admits Plan For Single NAFTA Currency | Military To Crackdown On North American Union Protesters | North American Union plan headed to Congress in fall | Fraser Institute: The Case for the Amero
September 4th, 2008 at 1:16 pm
““A majority of the publics in all three countries would prefer ‘integrated North American policies”
Nonsense. Factual data to back this ridiculous claim? ZERO.
Likelihood that it’s true: <ZERO
People do NOT wish to surrender their sovereignty. Take your North American Union and shove it.
September 19th, 2008 at 4:30 pm
[...] | See Also: Architect of North American integration urges reboot | Irish ‘need new EU treaty vote’ | Paul Martin promoting a new League of Nations on the road | [...]
September 26th, 2008 at 6:59 am
[...] | See Also: Towards a new world order: Canada-EU trade proposal rivals scope of NAFTA | Architect of North American integration urges reboot | Irish ‘need new EU treaty vote’ | Paul Martin promoting a new League of Nations on the road | [...]
October 18th, 2008 at 9:08 am
[...] deep integration | Towards a new world order: Canada-EU trade proposal rivals scope of NAFTA | Architect of North American integration urges reboot | Irish ‘need new EU treaty vote’ | Paul Martin promoting a new League of Nations on the [...]
November 22nd, 2008 at 5:14 am
[...] a North American Community, was cowritten by Manley in cooperation with Robert Pastor, the US mandarin on ‘economic integration.’ This is another dangerous development for Canada’s sovereignty as we are further rolled into [...]
December 28th, 2008 at 12:38 am
[...] Alternate headline… “Alleged economic conservative regurgitates Keynesian dogma for media, CCCE chief and ‘Building a North American Community’ co-author pushes infrastructure spending.” What are the chances that infrastructure money is going to go towards some NASCO corridor, new security and tracking technologies at the border, and the other initiatives driven by the US and called for in the SPP agenda which has since gone underground? [...]
December 28th, 2008 at 12:58 am
[...] U.S. into “Constitution-Free Zone” | CD Howe Institute backs Canada-EU deal, deep integration | Architect of North American integration urges reboot | Canada’s made in America energy policy | Canadian ambassador to address fourth annual North [...]
January 14th, 2009 at 2:20 pm
[...] rivals scope of NAFTA | NATO Considers Deploying Rapid-Reaction Force in States Bordering Russia | Architect of North American integration urges reboot | Canada’s made in America energy policy | Canadian ambassador to address fourth annual North [...]
February 4th, 2009 at 9:42 pm
[...] How many will be members of the CCCE; – purveyors of such fine legislative ideas as the SPP and North American integration. What’s wrong with just picking up the phone Flaherty? And that’s the real issue here – [...]
February 19th, 2009 at 2:03 pm
[...] rivals scope of NAFTA | NATO Considers Deploying Rapid-Reaction Force in States Bordering Russia | Architect of North American integration urges reboot | Canada’s made in America energy policy | Canadian ambassador to address fourth annual North [...]
April 20th, 2009 at 2:57 am
[...] continental, global integration | $12B for infrastructure forms key pillar of stimulus package | Architect of North American integration urges reboot | New bridge slated for Windsor-Detroit corridor: sources | Border ‘two-headed monster,’ [...]
November 1st, 2009 at 5:56 am
[...] [...]
February 8th, 2010 at 2:24 pm
[...] U.S. into “Constitution-Free Zone” | CD Howe Institute backs Canada-EU deal, deep integration | Architect of North American integration urges reboot | Canada’s made in America energy policy | Canadian ambassador to address fourth annual North [...]
April 12th, 2010 at 12:09 pm
[...] continental, global integration | $12B for infrastructure forms key pillar of stimulus package | Architect of North American integration urges reboot | New bridge slated for Windsor-Detroit corridor: sources | Border ‘two-headed monster,’ [...]