statism watch

Archive for July 23rd, 2008

Key Benazir Bhutto assassination witness shot dead

Wednesday, July 23rd, 2008

The Telegraph UK
July 23, 2008

The bodyguard of Benazir Bhutto, who was to be a key witness in an investigation into her assassination, has been shot dead.

Khalid Shahenshah, who was the former Pakistan prime minister’s security chief at the time of her assassination, was killed in a drive-by shooting as he left his house in the southern port city of Karachi on Tuesday, police said.

Mr Shahenshah, 45, was riding in Mrs Bhutto’s bullet-proof car when she was killed in a suicide attack in the northern city of Rawalpindi on December 27.

He was expected to be called to give evidence at a United Nations probe into her death.

“He was a key witness in the case and was also interviewed by the Scotland Yard experts who came to Pakistan to investigate her killing,” said Waqar Mehdi, the junior information minister of Sindh province.

(more…)

Vint Cerf blasts ISPs for choking off internet infrastructure

Wednesday, July 23rd, 2008

Peter Nowak, CBC News
July 23, 2008

Vint Cerf, who developed the technical principles on which the internet works, has blasted telephone and cable companies for harming national interests by holding investments in their networks to ransom.

Cerf, a long-time advocate of keeping the internet free from control by service providers and a current senior vice-president for search giant Google Inc., told the Silicon Valley Watcher blog that the companies are being childish by threatening to withhold upgrading networks unless they get breaks from regulators.

“Basically, it’s like little kids in a tantrum: ‘I’m not going to build this system unless you give me three scoops of ice cream and a pony,’”
he said in a video posted on the blog on Tuesday. “My reaction to this is quite negative. It’s harmful to the national interest to behave in this way because it is serious infrastructure – it’s very much like the road ways.”

Cerf said large internet service providers (ISPs) need to be split into two entities – one wholesale arm that sells access to the company’s network to other firms, and one retail arm that sells internet access to customers. The wholesale arm would have to sell access to other service providers at the same rate that it charges itself.

The model has been adopted in the United Kingdom and New Zealand, where Cerf said it is working. Separation of a company – if not fully structural, then at least of its accounting department – is necessary to keep competition in providing internet access alive, which will head off ISP interference such as the slowing of certain kinds of traffic that is happening in the United States and Canada.

“We have to provide incentives that cause those companies to behave differently or create an incentive for a competitor to put in facilities that will compete with them. I want to take away their monopoly mandate,” he said. “We have to make it a privilege to build the infrastructure. There has to be a reasonable rate of return, but it cannot be a confiscatory rate of return and it cannot be abused by allowing people to throttle competitors.”

Rogers stirs up new hornet’s nest

Cerf’s comments come as a new controversy has erupted over internet interference by a Canadian ISP.

Online message boards have been lit up for the past few days by users angry over a change made by Rogers Communications Inc. in how failed internet address searches are resolved.

Under the new system implemented last week, when a Rogers customer types in an internet address that does not exist they are redirected to a company-supported page with ads and links, rather than to the typical “server not found” page. Rogers did not notify customers of the change but does offer the ability to opt-out.

The move has outraged users, who say Rogers is hijacking their browser and searches. The opt-out function has also been criticized because it is browser-based, which means users must re-opt out every time they clear their tracking cookies.

“They did this to spam us with advertising when we type in a wrong [internet] address,” wrote one poster on the Digital Home website. “I can’t believe I pay Rogers for this service and they did this without asking us and they refuse to turn it off.”

Nancy Cottenden, spokesperson for Rogers, said the change was made in order to eliminate error pages and “provide helpful search results based on what a customer is looking for.”

“We make product enhancements on a regular basis and considered this to be one of them,”
she said. “We don’t notify on each and every one.”

University of Ottawa internet law professor Michael Geist said Rogers should offer the function on an opt-in basis, or at least institute the opt-out at a higher level – as other ISPs who have made this move have done – so that people don’t have to constantly reset their browsers.

“The Rogers approach certainly isn’t respectful of consumer choice,” he said. “The response that Rogers has been giving – ‘this is our network and we’ll do whatever we damn well please’ – does highlight what is for many a concern.”

Rogers took heat last year for putting its own content on other company’s web pages. Rogers experimented with inserting messages on sites such as Google that warned users they were nearing their monthly download limit, but quickly backtracked after being accused of violating net neutrality principles.

The company, along with Bell Canada Inc., is currently at the centre of a storm regarding the throttling of internet speeds: Their decision to slow down peer-to-peer internet applications such as BitTorrent has prompted a complaint with the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, which has said a full inquiry into net neutrality is coming.

Bell is also embroiled in a CRTC dispute with its internet wholesale customers, a fight that has seen Google accuse it of breaking Canadian telecommunications law. The CRTC expects to rule on the dispute with the Canadian Association of Internet Providers in September.

Cerf, who joined Google as a vice-president and “chief internet evangelist” in 2005, developed the transmission protocols that the internet is based on back in the 1970s.

Source | See Also:  Bell’s internet throttling illegal, Google says | Canadian Industry Minister lies about Canadian DMCA on national radio, then hangs up | The Canadian DMCA: Check the Fine Print | Government ready to drop copyright bomb | Transparency needed on ACTA | Net neutrality bill hits House of Commons | Revamped copyright law targets electronic devices | New Attempt to Align Canada’s Copyright Act with USA Coming Soon | CRTC revisits Internet oversight | Bell accused of privacy invasion | Canadian DMCA To Be Introduced Tomorrow Morning?

A City’s Police Force Now Doubts Focus on Terrorism

Wednesday, July 23rd, 2008

David Johnston, New York Times
July 23, 2008

PROVIDENCE, R.I. – Nearly seven years after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the war on terror in this city has evolved into a quiet struggle against a phantom foe.

Last year, when a sailor slipped over the side of a Turkish merchant ship in the city’s port, a Providence police detective assigned to a joint terrorism task force was quickly alerted, reflecting a new vigilance since the Sept. 11 attacks. Alerts also went out to immigration, customs, the F.B.I. and other federal agencies, but the case went cold.

Another alarm was sounded over a suspicious man of Indian descent who asked a metals dealer about buying old power tools and hair dryers. The lead petered out when the prospective buyer told a police detective in an interview that he wanted to refurbish the equipment for resale overseas.

Like most of the country’s more than 18,000 local law enforcement agencies, the Providence Police Department went to war against terror after 9/11, embracing a fundamental shift in its national security role. Cops everywhere had been shaken by disclosures that police officers in Oklahoma, Florida, Maryland and Virginia had stopped four of the 9/11 hijackers at various times for traffic violations, but had detected nothing amiss.

Over the years since, police officials in Providence joined with state and federal authorities in new information-sharing projects, met with local Muslim leaders and urged their officers to be alert for anything suspicious. Flush with federal homeland-security grants, the department acquired millions of dollars worth of hardware and enrolled officers in training courses to detect and respond to a terrorist attack.

But much has changed. Now, police officials here express doubts about whether the imperative to protect domestic security has blinded federal authorities to other priorities. The department is battling homicides, robberies and gang shootings that the police in a number of cities say are as serious a threat as terrorism.

Police experts said Providence’s experience was similar to that of other cities around the country. Looking back, local law enforcement agencies took on new counterterrorism responsibilities when violent crime rates had plunged to statistical lows.

By 2005 and 2006, while overall crime rates were stable, middle-size and larger cities began to be hit with increases in homicides, robberies and aggravated assaults, according to Chuck Wexler, executive director of the Police Executive Research Forum, which studies policing issues.

The International Association of Chiefs of Police recently issued a scathing analysis of federal spending, saying: “Unfortunately, funding federal homeland security efforts at the expense of state, tribal and local law enforcement agencies weakens rather than enhances our nation’s security.”

Full Story | See Also: Public conditioning continues: Ratings reach ‘Flashpoint’ for tactical assault squad drama | OPP threatened natives to end blockade | RCMP e-mails throw Dziekanski Taser probe into question, critics say | Illinois governor suggests National Guard help with Chicago gun crime | Toronto artist seeks explanation for police raid |  RCMP conducts random search and seizure on Canada Day | Papers Please: UK cops stopping millions in streets |  Police to demand blood, urine at roadside stops | Armed Police to Roam Toronto High Schools | Berlusconi puts 2,500 troops on streets of Italian cities to patrol alongside police | Justice Critic Brands Street Racing Vehicle Seizure Law as “Police State-ism” | British Terror Bill Divides Labor | Hats banned from Yorkshire pubs over CCTV fears | Youth Worker Subjected to Warrantless Raid on Secret Evidence | Crimestop: UK Police Now Expected to Collect Social, Dietary, Sexual Information | Man spends 18 hours in police cell and has his DNA taken for ‘dropping an apple core’ | In UK, anti-terror laws used to crack down on dog fouling, littering | Machine Gun-Toting Officers To Patrol NYC Subway | Massachusetts Police Get Black Uniforms to Instill Sense of ‘Fear’ | CBC Radio Broadcasts Expose of North American Police State | Military, Mounties teaming up to attract new recruits: Both forces aiming to beef up personnel | Harper pledges to boost military presence in cities | Ontario Police Chiefs travel to Israel to study police tactics

Public conditioning continues: Ratings reach ‘Flashpoint’ for tactical assault squad drama

Wednesday, July 23rd, 2008

Canadian Press
July 23, 2008

Get used to seeing these guys around

After netting top ratings in its first two weeks on both sides of the border, the syndicated Canadian police drama Flashpoint has earned a better time slot on CTV and CBS.

Both networks announced Tuesday that the show will move from the so-called “Friday night death slot” to the cushy Thursday 10 p.m. one — following ratings juggernaut So You Think You Can Dance — starting this week.

“Flashpoint is firing on all cylinders,” said Susanne Boyce, president of Creative, Content and Channels, CTV Inc., said in a release.

“The audience — and buzz — continues to build on both sides of the border. It’s a testament to the outstanding ensemble cast and exceptional writing.”

Flashpoint, a co-production between CBS and CTV, is set in Toronto and is based on the city’s real-life Emergency Task Force.

Its debut on July 11 was No. 1 for the night in the U.S. and Canada, attracting 1.1 million viewers to CTV on this side of the border and 8.1 million viewers to CBS south of the border, according to Nielsen Media Research.

The second episode last Friday lured in 908,000 viewers to CTV and 7.1 million to CBS, making it the most-watched program of the night again for both networks.

On iTunes in Canada, Flashpoint is the second-most downloaded television series, said CTV.

CBS said last week that if the show continues to perform beyond expectations, it may consider extending the series beyond its existing 13-episode summer order.

Source | See Also: OPP threatened natives to end blockade | RCMP e-mails throw Dziekanski Taser probe into question, critics say | Illinois governor suggests National Guard help with Chicago gun crime | Toronto artist seeks explanation for police raid |  RCMP conducts random search and seizure on Canada Day | Papers Please: UK cops stopping millions in streets |  Police to demand blood, urine at roadside stops | Armed Police to Roam Toronto High Schools | Berlusconi puts 2,500 troops on streets of Italian cities to patrol alongside police | Justice Critic Brands Street Racing Vehicle Seizure Law as “Police State-ism” | British Terror Bill Divides Labor | Hats banned from Yorkshire pubs over CCTV fears | Youth Worker Subjected to Warrantless Raid on Secret Evidence | Crimestop: UK Police Now Expected to Collect Social, Dietary, Sexual Information | Man spends 18 hours in police cell and has his DNA taken for ‘dropping an apple core’ | In UK, anti-terror laws used to crack down on dog fouling, littering | Machine Gun-Toting Officers To Patrol NYC Subway | Massachusetts Police Get Black Uniforms to Instill Sense of ‘Fear’ | CBC Radio Broadcasts Expose of North American Police State | Military, Mounties teaming up to attract new recruits: Both forces aiming to beef up personnel | Harper pledges to boost military presence in cities | Ontario Police Chiefs travel to Israel to study police tactics

21st Canadian TASER death occurs in Winnipeg alleyway

Wednesday, July 23rd, 2008

CBC News
July 23, 2008

A confrontation in a back lane in inner-city Winnipeg ended in the city’s first Taser-related death Tuesday, police said.

A man, believed to be in his 20s, died in hospital after officers fired a stun gun at him Tuesday afternoon. The man was in critical condition when he was admitted to hospital and died shortly after.

Around 4 p.m., police were called to an address near the corner of William Avenue and Arlington Street. The confrontation took place in a laneway behind a house.

“An electronic control device was used on a male by one of our officers,” said Winnipeg police Const. Jacqueline Chaput.

Larry Crisostomo, who lives near the area, told reporters he saw eight officers and a couple of paramedics working on a man on the ground.

“All I saw was a bunch of cop cars, ambulance, fire truck. They were all huddled around some guy trying to revive him, and they had to give him the paddles,” said Crisostomo.

Full Story | See Also: RCMP e-mails throw Dziekanski Taser probe into question, critics say | Taser use could put police under fire | Inquiry says ‘insidious’ TASERs being used as tool of convenience, should be reclassified, restricted under criminal code | Man dies in custody after Taser incident involving Ontario police | Ban Tasers if RCMP doesn’t curb use by year’s end: Commons committee | One-third of people shot by Taser need medical attention: probe | RCMP firing Tasers multiple times at subjects, probe reveals | U.S. jury shocks Taser, investors, with rare loss in court | Tasering violated suspect’s rights, judge rules | RCMP willing to change Taser policy, inquiry told | Tasers pose risk to heart, MDs testify | ‘Peel and Stick’ Tasers Electrify Riot Control | Canadian police have been brainwashed, Taser inquiry told | Mounties censor Taser report | Taser group’s chair to defend stun guns at public inquiry | Chicago study calls Taser’s safety claims into question | Officer injured in Taser demonstration

Terrorism claims against Khawaja stunned his ex-fiancée

Wednesday, July 23rd, 2008

Richard Brennan, Toronto Star
July 23, 2008

OTTAWA—The former fiancée of accused terrorist Momin Khawaja says he may have longed to fight in Afghanistan and that he praised the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attack on the U.S., but she never considered him an extremist or a terrorist.

“Just because he supports these things in theory is not actually proof of his involvement as such,” Zeba Khan told Ontario Superior Court yesterday in a video link-up from Dubai.

Khan told RCMP investigators during a lengthy interview at the Canadian consulate in Dubai on Sept. 19, 2005, that her sister once described Khawaja as a “blowhard” who liked to hear “the sound of his own voice.”

Khan told Khawaja’s landmark terror trial she saw him as just another angry young Muslim man she hoped to change once they got married, a marriage that didn’t happen because Khawaja decided he was a jihadist first and foremost.

“I thought I would marry him and change him,” said Khan, 28.

Khan, who was wearing a pink hijab, said she hoped to rechannel Khawaja’s energies away from obsessing about getting even with the West and into something positive, such as humanitarian work.

Khan told the court that Khawaja’s behaviour “did not in any way line up to terrorist activity.”

Khawaja, 29, born and raised in Orleans near Ottawa, faces seven terrorism charges, including funding a terrorist group and building an electronic device that the Crown alleges was to be used to detonate a 600-kilogram fertilizer bomb.

He was the first person charged in Canada under the Anti-Terrorism Act, passed by Parliament in response to the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks in the United States.

Khan testified in court and told RCMP investigators in June 2004 and September 2005 that Khawaja was angry because of the attacks on Iraq and Afghanistan by Western forces. “There are hundreds of thousands of angry young Muslim men the world over,” she said.

Khan, who exchanged scores of emails with Khawaja during their brief courtship, said while Khawaja openly expressed his hatred toward the West and his willingness to fight in Afghanistan, that didn’t mean he was a “terrorist” in her eyes.

“I am saying when a person wants to go and join in conventional warfare, it is not terrorism,” she told police. “Saying I believe in jihad doesn’t mean I believe in blowing things up.”

Source | See Also: Terror suspect’s inflammatory personal EMails judged admissable | Informant ‘never discussed’ fertilizer bomb plot with accused in Ottawa ‘terror trial’ | Trial of Canadian charged in UK fertilizer bomb plot gets underway | FBI Informant in British terror trial given immunity, proceedings raise question of what MI5 knew about 2005 London bombings | Five guilty in UK bomb plot | Terror accused refuses to discuss links to Pakistan secret service, family threatened | London terror plotter was ‘hardened’ in ISI camp | Fertiliser claim in terror trial | Terror informant names plotters | British ‘Terror Suspects’ Were in Contact With MI5 | Eight held in British anti-terror raids | US Allowed Taliban, Al-Qaeda Airlift Evacuation

MySpace signs up to OpenID scheme

Wednesday, July 23rd, 2008

BBC News
July 23, 2008


MySpace members will soon be able to use their login details to get access to some other websites.

The social networking giant, which boasts more than 100 million accounts, has signed up for the OpenID initiative.

The project aims to ease the mental load of going online by letting people use one set of login details for many different places.

Sites such as AOL, Blogger, Flickr and Yahoo already use OpenID.

“All this will tie together to make it more useful for MySpace users to have MySpace accounts even when they’re not on MySpace,” Jim Benedetto, the company’s senior vice president of technology told Reuters.

However, MySpace is not letting its members use their login profiles and details on any site. It has set restrictions on where the login details can be used based on whether those sites create or accept OpenID profiles.

It will only allow MySpace details to be used to get access to what are known as “relying parties” – organisations that accept rather than create the portable identities. Sites such as Plaxo are relying parties.

Initially, OpenID profiles created from a MySpace account will be blocked from being used on sites regarded as “providers”. In the OpenID scheme sites that let create OpenID profiles for use elsewhere are “providers”.

Similarly, MySpace will not allow people who get an OpenID from a provider, such as Yahoo, to use that to login to the social network site.

It said in the future its policy would change to let members get the most out of OpenID.

It is estimated that more than 4500 sites accept OpenIDs and there are about 120 million OpenIDs in use.

Source | See Also: Behavioral Targeting: ‘It’s Only Going to Get Creepier’ | Bluetooth is watching: secret study gives Bath a flavour of Big Brother | Britain considers giant database of all phone calls, EMails, browsing history | Your turn to speak: Privacy chief seeking input on biometric ID plan | Scientists: Humans and machines will merge in future | Electronic devices to self-censor, shut down at word from authorities with proposed ‘Digital Manners’ technology | Mobile Phone Users Secretly Tracked for Behaviorist Study | Ontario to issue Biometric ID Cards in Lieu of Standard Photo ID for Non-Drivers | Criticism for ‘UK database’ plan | Tokyo Vending Machines Learn New Trick: Facial Recognition | American Border Officers Want to Fingerprint Canadians at SPP Bridge | U.S. to collect DNA at border | Widen DNA dragnet: Police Chief Blair | American Security Czar: Biometric Data Not Private | North American ID card in the works through SPP | Mobile phone inventor dreams of human embeds | Canada working with FBI on ’server in the sky’ | FBI wants instant access to British, Canadian identity data | Prisoners ‘to be chipped like dogs’ | UNBC students give thumbs down to fingerprint scanners | Give public biometrics the finger

Global ‘liberalization’ illusion under threat. Economist calls for world economic regime, Keynesian saviour. Irony?

Wednesday, July 23rd, 2008

Dani Rodrik, Toronto Star
July 23, 2008

Even former proponents full of doubt as crises ripple through system built on shaky pillars

The world economy has seen globalization collapse once already. The gold standard era — with its free capital mobility and open trade — came to an abrupt end in 1914 and could not be resuscitated after World War I. Are we about to witness a similar global economic breakdown?

The question is not fanciful. Although economic globalization has enabled unprecedented levels of prosperity in advanced countries and has been a boon to hundreds of millions of poor workers in China and elsewhere in Asia, it rests on shaky pillars.

Unlike national markets, which tend to be supported by domestic regulatory and political institutions, global markets are only “weakly embedded.” There is no global anti-trust authority, no global lender of last resort, no global regulator, no global safety nets and, of course, no global democracy.

In other words, global markets suffer from weak governance, and therefore from weak popular legitimacy.

Recent events have heightened the urgency with which these issues are discussed. The presidential electoral campaign in the United States has highlighted the frailty of the support for open trade in the world’s most powerful nation.

The subprime mortgage crisis has shown how lack of international co-ordination and regulation can exacerbate the inherent fragility of financial markets. The rise in food prices has exposed the downside of economic interdependence without global transfer and compensation schemes.

Meanwhile, rising oil prices have increased transport costs, leading analysts to wonder whether the outsourcing era is coming to an end. And there is always the looming disaster of climate change, which may well be the most serious threat the world has ever faced.

So if globalization is in danger, who are its real enemies? There was a time when global elites could comfort themselves with the thought that opposition to the world trading regime consisted of violent anarchists, self-serving protectionists, trade unionists and ignorant, if idealistic youth.

Meanwhile, they regarded themselves as the true progressives, because they understood that safeguarding and advancing globalization was the best remedy against poverty and insecurity.

But that self-assured attitude has all but disappeared, replaced by doubts, questions and skepticism. Gone also are the violent street protests and mass movements against globalization. What makes news nowadays is the growing list of mainstream economists who are questioning globalization’s supposedly unmitigated virtues.

That is an important point for globalization’s cheerleaders to understand, as they often behave as if the “other side” still consists of protectionists and anarchists.

Today, the question is no longer, “Are you for or against globalization?” The question is, “What should the rules of globalization be?” The cheerleaders’ true sparring partners today are not rock-throwing youths but their fellow intellectuals.

The first three decades after 1945 were governed by the Bretton Woods consensus — a shallow multilateralism that permitted policy-makers to focus on domestic social and employment needs while enabling global trade to recover and flourish.

This regime was superseded in the 1980s and 1990s by an agenda of deeper liberalization and economic integration.

That model, we have learned, is unsustainable. If globalization is to survive, it will need a new intellectual consensus to underpin it. The world economy desperately awaits its new Keynes.

Source | See Also: Federal Reserve cites global stakes in Fannie and Freddie rescue | Financial ’super cop’ role for Fed | What Really Killed Bear Stearns? | Soros points out regulated markets fail to operate on market fundamentals, calls for more regulation | Competition study calls for lowered barriers to foreign ownership, bank mergers | Massive overhaul urged on foreign investment in airlines, media, and banks | Bilderberg Seeks Bank Centralization Agenda | Secretive Bilderberg Group Reverses Policy, Releases Press Release and Attendance List

Federal Reserve cites global stakes in Fannie and Freddie rescue

Wednesday, July 23rd, 2008

Toronto Star
July 23, 2008

WASHINGTON—Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson says he is confident Congress will quickly approve a support package for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to make sure the two mortgage giants maintain their critically important role in housing finance.

Paulson said yesterday the continued operations of Fannie and Freddie — which guarantee or own almost half of the home mortgages in the United States — would be “central to the speed with which we emerge from this housing correction.”

Paulson made his comments in a speech in New York in which he again sought to reassure Americans that the nation’s banking system is fundamentally sound.

Treasury officials confirmed that bank examiners from both the Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller are currently inspecting the books at both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Paulson spoke in advance of the release of a review by the Congressional Budget Office giving an estimate of the budgetary impact of the administration’s request for new authority to provide support for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The U.S. administration on July 13 unveiled a plan to provide unlimited government loans to the two mortgage giants and also to purchase stock in the two companies if needed. Paulson has stressed that the proposal is a backup effort that would be in effect for 18 months as a way to calm investor fears.

Critics have charged that the open-ended offer of support exposes taxpayers to billions of dollars of losses.

The administration and leaders in both the House and Senate have been in negotiations over the plan. Paulson predicted in his speech that Congress would “act to complete work on this legislation this week.”

Paulson said that Fannie and Freddie have issued $5 trillion in debt and mortgage backed securities. Of that more than $1.5 trillion is held by foreign institutions, making the stabilization of the two companies essential to the global economy.

Source | See Also: Financial ’super cop’ role for Fed | What Really Killed Bear Stearns? | Soros points out regulated markets fail to operate on market fundamentals, calls for more regulation | Competition study calls for lowered barriers to foreign ownership, bank mergers | Massive overhaul urged on foreign investment in airlines, media, and banks | Bilderberg Seeks Bank Centralization Agenda | Secretive Bilderberg Group Reverses Policy, Releases Press Release and Attendance List