statism watch

  • Topicgate

  • Search

  • News Alerts

  • Recent Forum Posts

  • Recent Comments

  •  

    May 2008
    S M T W T F S
    « Apr   Jun »
     123
    45678910
    11121314151617
    18192021222324
    25262728293031
  • Archives

Archive for May 6th, 2008

Pentagon Secretly Goes To War With The Internet

Tuesday, May 6th, 2008

infowars.net
May 6, 2008

The Pentagon is to spend $30 Billion building a super secret “National Cyber Range” in order to prepare for all out cyber warfare by using it to conduct mock online battles with realistic info-warriors.

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), previously responsible for the development of electronic surveillance programs such as Total Information Awareness and MATRIX, LifeLog and the Brain Machine Interfaces enterprise, has been ordered by Congress to create what is essentially a new internet as a cyberspace battleground.

Wired.com has reported “According to a defense official familiar with the program: ‘Congress has given DARPA a direct order; that’s only happened once before — with the Sputnik program in the ’50s’”

Full Story

Trilateral Commission: Global Elite Gather in D.C.

Tuesday, May 6th, 2008

James P. Tucker Jr., globalresearch.ca
May 6, 2008

The Trilateral Commission—one of the three most powerful globalist groups in the world—held closed-door meetings right here in Washington, D.C. from April 25 to 28. True to form, those members of the media who knew about the meeting—or were themselves participants in the proceedings—refused to discuss what went on inside or report on the attendees. Luckily, AFP’s own editor, Jim Tucker, was on the scene to bust this clandestine confabulation wide open.

Luminaries at the Trilateral Commission meeting in Washington expressed confidence that they own all three major presidential candidates, who, despite political posturing, will support sovereignty-surrendering measures such as NAFTA and the “North American Union.”

“John has always supported free trade, even while campaigning before union leaders,” said one. “Hil and Barack are pretending to be unhappy about some things, but that’s merely political posturing. They’re solidly in support.”

John Negroponte, U.S. deputy secretary of state, addressed the evening dinner on “U.S. foreign policy perspectives.” Again, the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan were rationalized and an invasion of Iran held out as a possibility.

The Monday morning finale addressed the Global Financial Crisis involving these luminaries: Robert Kimmitt, U.S. deputy secretary of the treasury; Martin Feldstein, former chairman of the President’s Council of Economic Advisers; David Rubenstein, managing director of The Carlyle Group; Naoki Tanaka, president of the Center for International Public Policy Studies and Sir Andrew Crockett, president of JP Morgan Chase International.

Among them, there was much talk of the U.S. government’s “duty” to “intervene” on behalf of “financial institutions under stress.” Little or nothing was said of the hundreds of thousands of Americans who are losing their homes because financial institutions lured them into buying houses they could not afford.

Throughout the weekend, no American voices were heard objecting to the demands on their country. Instead, there were smiles, nods and applause.

Full Story

Guards Assault Toronto “Bomb Plot” Accused in Jail

Tuesday, May 6th, 2008

CBC News
Last Updated: Tuesday, May 6, 2008

A lawyer representing one of the 11 remaining Toronto bomb plot suspects arrested on terror-related charges in June 2006 says his client has been roughed up in prison.

Michael Moon said his client, Stephen Chand, was taking a shower at Maplehurst provincial jail in Milton west of Toronto. When he tried to rinse soap from his hair, Moon said, a guard smashed Chand’s face into a wall, then dragged him naked along a hallway by his hair and threw him into a bare cell smeared with feces and smelling of urine.

The lawyer is demanding that surveillance videos of the incident be released by the Ontario government, though internal investigations at the facility found no wrongdoing by guards.

“These videos capture everything that goes on on the range,” Moon said, “If he [Chand] did anything wrong, it will be shown on the video. If what he says is accurate, that will be shown.”

Moon also says that when another inmate complained about the treatment of Chand, he too was thrown into the bare cell, known as the hole.

Full Story

HPV vaccination program raises concerns in B.C.

Tuesday, May 6th, 2008

CBC News
Last Updated: Tuesday, May 6, 2008

New immunization program for girls in Grades 6 and 9 announced Monday

Girls as young as 11 in B.C. will now be offered a human papilloma virus vaccine for free, Health Minister George Abbott announced Monday.

But already some parents are saying their daughters will not be getting the shots.

Girls entering Grades 6 and 9 this fall will be offered the Gardasil vaccine for HPV as part of the regular immunization schedule.

The vaccine offers protection from two strains of HPV linked to cervical cancer.

More time and research needs to take place, according to Edda West, a parent and spokesperson for the Vaccination Risk Awareness Network in B.C.

“It hasn’t been used long enough. We don’t know what the long term … repercussions are,” West said. “We know that cervical cancer takes a long time to develop. They don’t even know how long this vaccine offers immunity for.”

The HPV vaccine will be voluntary. The province plans a public education campaign to counter the criticism surrounding its use.

Similar programs are already underway in several other provinces, including Quebec, Ontario and the Atlantic provinces. Abbott said he’s confident most B.C. parents will want their children to get the vaccine.

Full Story

Toronto Residents Furious Over RFID Garbage Bins

Tuesday, May 6th, 2008

Globe and Mail
May 6, 2008

As part of Toronto Mayor David Miller’s new trash regime, city workers are rolling out a new 240-litre recycling bin.

“The recycling-cart delivery was supposed to be the palatable phase of Toronto’s new pay-by-what-you-throw garbage system, which officially launches in the city’s more than 5,000 apartment and condo buildings July 1, and in its 500,000 single-family homes Nov. 1,” Kelly Grant writes in her weekend article for Globe T.O.

“More than 100,000 Torontonians — a whopping one-third of the residents who’ve received bins so far — have called the city’s bin hotline with questions and gripes since the solid-waste department began dropping off bins late last November. About 500 have complained forcefully enough to get a home visit from a member of the city’s ‘bin team.’ ”

Lowen Wrainger from Canada writes: Since I can only afford to live in a basement apartment in a house, the dwelling gets only one of those big blue containers. The first time it was used in the 2 week cycle it was filled to the brim. What does this say? It says that we are diligently re-cycling everything that can be while the retail/packaging industry justs keeps stuffing us with more bulk.

Kelly Grant: Thanks for writing. You’re the first to tell me the mammoth new carts aren’t big enough. You’re just the kind of devoted recycler the city adores. As for the packaging industry — with its products wrapped in plastic, encased in styrofoam and stuffed in boxes — the city has a panel plugging away at convincing the industry to cut down on packaging. Wish them luck. (I suspect they’ll need it.).

As for you, there might be a way to solve your household’s dearth of recycling space. The default size for the blue bins is large (240-litre) but the city actually offers an even bigger, “extra-large” bin. You can request a (free) exchange within three months of receiving your blue bin.

Gayle Murphy from Canada writes: Well, I wish you good luck with this, but I wonder where all the outrage was when all this started, when most people were not paying attention? My first letter to Pam McConnell was in May 2007, a year ago. By now, the City has paid a very great deal of money for bins and other roll out expenses. Solid Waste Management is absolutely committed to this. The Mayor is calling it a success, even though thousands of people have complained, many more don’t know how to complain, and the City is now permanently blighted with huge bins. They are everywhere, blocking sidewalks, and ruining beautiful neighbourhoods. Garbage is now THE design feature of the City. There were so many other ways to charge for garbage pickup other than inflict these bins on us. But Solid Waste was absolutely sold and the City has to suffer forever for it.

Kelly Grant: Good question Gayle. Where was everyone last summer when council (by a vote of 26 to 18) adopted this program? Buried in the tax debate, unfortunately. The fight over the new land-transfer and vehicle-ownership taxes overshadowed everything else the city did last summer, including passing this sweeping change to Toronto’s trash regime. It’s funny, last week I asked Councillor Paula Fletcher (a Miller loyalist) whether she regretted voting in favour of the plan. She paused, then said she might have reconsidered her stance if solid-waste staff had actually rolled the garbage and recycling carts onto the council floor. Even councillors didn’t grasp what giant eyesores these would be on streets in the city’s dense core.

N E from Toronto Canada writes: I live in Leslieville in a house that has a 23 inch gap between us and our neighbours; just barely enough to squeeze the smallest new blue bin down — and we count ourselves lucky. Our street of semi-detached and row houses is littered with blue bins — on porches, on sidewalks, sitting in the middle of small front gardens. It looks horrible. I feel that City Hall considers us second-class citizens by making no effort to design a collection solution that acknowledges the many types of dense urban housing. What did the planners of this system do in advance to plan for the circumstances of people like us and our neighbours?

Kelly Grant: I know it doesn’t seem like it, but the solid waste bureaucrats did recognize these bins would be a problem in urban neighbourhoods like yours. They conducted big bin pilot projects on streets like Amelia in Cabbagetown. In fact, I went out and interviewed people on that very street during the pilot phase. The people I spoke with didn’t kick up much of a stink — but you know what? I got the feeling some of them were reluctant to bash the program because they didn’t want to be seen as less-than-enthusiastic recyclers. After my story ran, I received a letter from a reader on Davenport, on Toronto’s west side, saying her street had also been part of the pilot. Residents railed against the bins, she said, but the city ignored their concerns.

johnnie winter from Toronto Canada writes: hi, thanks for agreeing to speak on this topic. what scares me is the bar code and scanner abilities of the new bins – what info will be collected and what will be done with it? there appear to be no regulations surrounding all of this and i am surprised that no one is concerned about this. thanks.

Kelly Grant: Thanks for the question. Quite a few people have actually raised this concern at council and committee meetings. As far as I know, the RFID chips inside every recycling and garbage can will contain address information — that way, if a cart is stolen it can be reunited with its rightful owner. I’m afraid I don’t know exactly what other info the city will include on the chips — but I don’t expect it would be any more intrusive than what City Hall already has on file to process your property tax bills.

Dave Douglas from Canada writes: The City of San Francisco implemented a ‘bin’ based collection program a number of years ago. Recently, City officials have begun issuing $100 tickets if their garbage or recycling cans can be seen from the street on any day other than collection day. Could this be in store for Toronto, considering the concern that these bins are quite visible on the landscape?

Kelly Grant: No plans to issue these kinds of tickets in Toronto — yet. But the new program does have a budget for enforcement. I expect the trash police will be tied up trying to stop illegal dumping in parks and other public spaces when the garbage portion of the regime kicks in Nov. 1.

Full Story | See Also: The monster (blue bin) that ate downtown | Bin Brother is watching you

CSIS Spying on Natives, Olympic Dissidents

Tuesday, May 6th, 2008

Jorge Barrera, Canwest News Service
Tuesday, May 06, 2008

Canada’s spy agency has been monitoring anti-Olympic activities for more than a year and found the strongest opposition to the athletic event to be among “the more extreme elements” of First Nations groups, particularly in alliance with anti-poverty groups, according to an internal government document obtained by Canwest News Service.

The censored document was sent by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service to the Department of Public Safety and refers to an event hosted last spring by the Vancouver Olympic Committee. The six-page, French and English document, titled CSIS Threat Assessment and marked “secret,” provides little detail about the seriousness of the threat by the groups.

However, it does highlight their convergence in opposition to the Olympics, a concern recently voiced by a former RCMP intelligence and national security expert.

Dated March 21, 2007, the threat assessment analyzed potential disruptions to a planned “Urban Aboriginal Friendship Celebration,” which was to take place three days later. The event was hosted by the Vancouver Olympic Committee “to reach out to the aboriginal community in Vancouver,” said the assessment, which was released under the Access to Information Act.

“VANOC has been criticized for not taking enough action to address the concerns of Vancouver’s aboriginal community,” said the assessment.

In a partly censored passage, the assessment noted that “opposition to the 2010 Olympic Games is most noticeable amongst the more extreme elements of First Nations communities.”

It then referred to Native Warrior Society members who stole the Olympic flag on March 6, 2007 to “protest against the Games.” The rest of the passage, like other large chunks of the assessment, is blanked out under a section of the Access to Information Act allowing for censoring of information that could be “injurious to the conduct of international affairs, the defence of Canada… or the detection, prevention or suppression of subversives…”

The assessment also highlights that First Nations and anti-poverty groups joined together during a Feb. 12, 2007 protest at the unveiling of the Olympic countdown clock.

“Eight individuals were arrested for mischief and assault when they disrupted the ceremony,” the document noted. “Specifically, members of the Native Youth Movement and the Anti-Olympic Coalition were arrested when they rushed the stage.” A section of this passage is also blacked out.

In the following passage, which is uncensored, the assessment described the coalition as “a Vancouver-based special interest group comprised of members of the groups No One is Illegal, the Anti-Poverty Coalition, and the Downtown Eastside Residents Association.”

A passage on the Native Youth Movement is almost totally blanked out, except for its description as ” a group of aboriginal youth who challenge land treaty issues in British Columbia.”

A member of the Native Youth movement described her group as “freedom fighters,” but expressed surprise that they were named in the threat assessment.

“We are a native youth organization and we are not out there to cause destruction, but to protect and preserve the natural environment,” a member of the organization, who goes by the name Kanahus, said in a telephone interview from the B.C. First Nations community of Neskonlith.

“If they feel any type of threat from us [it is because] we are exposing the real issues. The way they deal with native people standing up for our rights is by using the police and things like CSIS.”

Kanahus said her group planned to continue its campaign against the Olympics.

“We are not doing anything wrong, so I have no fear about what we are doing because what we are doing is educating the public,” she said.

“We are fighting for the land and need the masses to get onside with the native youth movement, to get onside in the fight to defend our land, our hunting grounds, our mountains, all our food … If we don’t speak for the salmon the salmon are not going to continue to exist.”

Tom Quiggin, a former RCMP intelligence and national security expert, wrote recently that the “forward planning” by native and anti-poverty groups for Olympic protests was “unprecedented” and warned authorities were moving too slowly in preparing for the threat.

“A clear upturn in violent protest activity is occurring,” Mr. Quiggin wrote last month from Israel in a report for the International Policy Institute for Counter-Terrorism. “Most disturbing, there has been an increased identification of public and private figures by name in numerous postings which announce or encourage violence.”

Assembly of First Nations national Chief Phil Fontaine has already warned that First Nations could launch protests in the run-up to the Olympics.

Full Story